Does Metacognition Matter in the Relationship between Mathematics Interest and Mathematics Anxiety?

Rani Aprilia, Lucia RM Royanto


The purpose of this research is to find out whether there is an influence of mathematics interest on mathematics anxiety mediated by metacognitive knowledge in 5th-grader. The research data collected from 366 5th-grader in South Jakarta obtained using convenience sampling technique. Data collection carried out using questionnaires consists of Modified Abbreviated Math Anxiety Scale (mAMAS), the interest value subscale of the Subjective Task Value Scale, and Metacognitive Knowledge in Mathematics Questionnaire (MKMQ). From the analysis, mathematics interest has a significant effect on mathematics anxiety, and each dimension of metacognitive knowledge mediates them. However, metacognitive knowledge only mediates the influence of mathematics interest on mathematics anxiety partially. This means mathematics interest can affect mathematics anxiety both directly and through metacognitive knowledge variables.


Mathematics anxiety; Mathematics interest; Metacognitive knowledge; Elementary school students

Full Text:



Akinsola, M. K., Tella, A., & Tella, A. (2007). Correlates of academic procrastination and mathematics achievement of university undergraduate students. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 3(4), 363–370.

Arthur, Y. D., Oduro, F. T., & Boadi, R. K. (2014). Statistical analysis of Ghanaian students attitude and interest towards learning mathematics. International Journal of Education and Research, 2(6), 661–670.

Ashcraft, M. H., & Moore, A. M. (2009). Mathematics Anxiety and the Affective Drop in Performance. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 27(3), 197–205.

Azmidar, A., Darhim, D., & Dahlan, J. A. (2017). Enhancing students’ interest through mathematics learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 895, 012072.

Blazer, C. (2011). Strategies for reducing math anxiety. Information Capsule, 1102(8).

Borgers, N., Hox, J., & Sikkel, D. (2004). Response effects in surveys on children and adolescents: The effect of number of response options, negative wording, and neutral mid-point. Quality & Quantity, 38(1), 17–33.

Carey, E., Hill, F., Devine, A., & Szűcs, D. (2017). The modified abbreviated math anxiety scale: A valid and reliable instrument for use with children. Frontiers in Psychology, 8.

Casad, B. J., Hale, P., & Wachs, F. L. (2015). Parent-child math anxiety and math-gender stereotypes predict adolescents’ math education outcomes. Frontiers in Psychology, 6.

Desoete, A., Roeyers, H., & Buysse, A. (2001). Metacognition and Mathematical Problem Solving in Grade 3. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 34(5), 435–447.

Efklides, A. (2008). Metacognition: Defining Its Facets and Levels of Functioning in Relation to Self-Regulation and Co-regulation. European Psychologist, 13(4), 277–287.

Efklides, A., & Vlachopoulos, S. P. (2012). Measurement of metacognitive knowledge of self, task, and strategies in mathematics. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 28(3), 227–239.

Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906–911.

Frenzel, A. C., Goetz, T., Pekrun, R., & Watt, H. M. G. (2010). Development of mathematics interest in adolescence: Influences of gender, family, and school context: Development of mathematics interest in adolescence. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 20(2), 507–537.

Furner, J. M., & Duffy, M. L. (2002). Equity for all students in the new millennium: Disabling math anxiety. Intervention in School and Clinic, 38(2), 67–74.

García, T., Rodríguez, C., González-Castro, P., González-Pienda, J. A., & Torrance, M. (2016). Elementary students’ metacognitive processes and post-performance calibration on mathematical problem-solving tasks. Metacognition and Learning, 11(2), 139–170.

Hayes, A. F. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (Second edition). Guilford Press.

Heinze, A., Reiss, K., & Franziska, R. (2005). Mathematics achievement and interest in mathematics from a differential perspective. Zentralblatt Für Didaktik Der Mathematik, 37(3), 212–220.

Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (2006). The four-phase model of interest development. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 111–127.

Hoffman, B., & Spatariu, A. (2008). The influence of self-efficacy and metacognitive prompting on math problem-solving efficiency. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33(4), 875–893.

Høgheim, S., & Reber, R. (2019). Interesting, but less interested: Gender differences and similarities in mathematics interest. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 63(2), 285–299.

Hoorfar, H., & Taleb, Z. (2015). Correlation between mathematics anxiety with metacognitive knowledge. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 182, 737–741.

Hopko, D. R., Mahadevan, R., Bare, R. L., & Hunt, M. K. (2003). The abbreviated math anxiety scale (AMAS): Construction, validity, and reliability. Assessment, 10(2), 178–182.

Jameson, M. M. (2014). Contextual factors related to math anxiety in second-grade children. The Journal of Experimental Education, 82(4), 518–536.

Luttenberger, S., Wimmer, S., & Paechter, M. (2018). Spotlight on math anxiety. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, Volume 11, 311–322.

Lyons, I. M., & Beilock, S. L. (2012). When math hurts: Math anxiety predicts pain network activation in anticipation of doing math. PLoS ONE, 7(10), e48076.

Maloney, E. A., Ramirez, G., Gunderson, E. A., Levine, S. C., & Beilock, S. L. (2015). Intergenerational effects of parents’ math anxiety on children’s math achievement and anxiety. Psychological Science, 26(9), 1480–1488.

Masjaya, & Wardono. (2018). Pentingnya kemampuan literasi matematika untuk menumbuhkan kemampuan koneksi matematika dalam meningkatkan SDM. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika, 1, 568–574.

Morsanyi, K., Ní Cheallaigh, N., & Ackerman, R. (2019). Mathematics Anxiety and Metacognitive Processes: Proposal for a New Line of Inquiry. Psihologijske Teme, 28(1), 147–169.

Neuenhaus, N., Artelt, C., Lingel, K., & Schneider, W. (2011). Fifth graders metacognitive knowledge: General or domain-specific? European Journal of Psychology of Education, 26(2), 163–178.

OECD. (2013). PISA 2012 assessment and analytical framework: Mathematics, reading, science, problem solving and financial literacy. OECD.

OECD. (2015). Education at a Glance: OECD Indicators. OECD.

OECD. (2018). PISA 2015 results in focus. OECD.

Otoo, D., Iddrisu, W. A., Kessie, J. A., & Larbi, E. (2018). Structural model of students’ interest and self-motivation to learning mathematics. Education Research International, 2018, 1–10.

Özsoy, G. (2011). An investigation of the relationship between metacognition and mathematics achievement. Asia Pacific Education Review, 12(2), 227–235.

Paechter, M., Macher, D., Martskvishvili, K., Wimmer, S., & Papousek, I. (2017). Mathematics anxiety and statistics anxiety: Shared but also unshared components and antagonistic contributions to performance in statistics. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1196.

Perry, J., Lundie, D., & Golder, G. (2019). Metacognition in schools: What does the literature suggest about the effectiveness of teaching metacognition in schools? Educational Review, 71(4), 483–500.

Ramirez, G., Gunderson, E. A., Levine, S. C., & Beilock, S. L. (2013). Math anxiety, working memory, and math achievement in early elementary school. Journal of Cognition and Development, 14(2), 187–202.

Richardson, F. C., & Suinn, R. M. (1972). The mathematics anxiety rating scale: Psychometric data. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 19(6), 551–554.

Schneider, W., & Artelt, C. (2010). Metacognition and mathematics education. ZDM, 42(2), 149–161.

Schraw, G., & Moshman, D. (1995). Metacogitive theories. Educational Psychology Review, 7(4), 351–371.

Shields, D. J. (2005). Teachers have the power to alleviate math anxiety. Academic Exchange Quarterly, 9(3), 326–330.

Skaalvik, E. M. (2018). Mathematics anxiety and coping strategies among middle school students: Relations with students’ achievement goal orientations and level of performance. Social Psychology of Education, 21(3), 709–723.

Smith, A. (2004). Making mathematics count: The report of Professor Adrian Smith’s inquiry into post-14 mathematics education. Department for Education and Skills (DFES).

Sousa, D. A. (2008). How the brain learns mathematics. Corwin Press.

Stangor, C. (2011). Research methods for the behavioral sciences (4th ed). Wadsworth Cengage Learning.

Veenman, M. V. J., & Spaans, M. A. (2005). Relation between intellectual and metacognitive skills: Age and task differences. Learning and Individual Differences, 15(2), 159–176.

Veenman, M. V. J., Wilhelm, P., & Beishuizen, J. J. (2004). The relation between intellectual and metacognitive skills from a developmental perspective. Learning and Instruction, 14(1), 89–109.

Wang, Z., Lukowski, S. L., Hart, S. A., Lyons, I. M., Thompson, L. A.,

Kovas, Y., Mazzocco, M. M. M., Plomin, R., & Petrill, S. A. (2015). Is Math Anxiety Always Bad for Math Learning? The Role of Math Motivation. Psychological Science, 26(12), 1863–1876.

White, B., Frederiksen, J., & Collins, A. (2009). The Interplay of Scientific Inquiry and Metacognition: More than a Marriage of Convenience. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Handbook of Metacognition in Education (pp. 175–205). Taylor & Francis.

Wigfield, A., Eccles, J. S., Yoon, K. S., Harold, R. D., Arbreton, A. J. A., Freedman-Doan, C., & Blumenfeld, P. C. (1997). Change in children’s competence beliefs and subjective task values across the elementary school years: A 3-year study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(3), 451–469.

Yeh, C. Y. C., Cheng, H. N. H., Chen, Z.-H., Liao, C. C. Y., & Chan, T.-W. (2019). Enhancing achievement and interest in mathematics learning through Math-Island. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 14(1), 5.

Zhang, J., Zhao, N., & Kong, Q. P. (2019). The relationship between math anxiety and math performance: A meta-analytic investigation. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1613.


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

 ISSN: 1305-3515