Development of Analytical Thinking Tendency Scale: Validity and Reliability Study

Gökhan Aksu, Mehmet Taha Eser

Abstract


This study aims to develop a analytical thinking tendency scale for university students. In this direction, a draft scale, consisting of 50 items, was applied to 574 university students. The obtained data were subjected to reliability tests, explanatory and confirmatory factor analysis (EFA-CFA). The factor analysis showed that the scale is composed of 2 factors. The percentage of variance explained by the factors was calculated as 43%. The fit indexes of the model obtained via CFA showed that the fit indexes of the two-factor structure are sufficient. Considering the reliability coefficients and AVE values calculated within the scope of the research, it can be said that the measurement results are reliable, and the divergent validity of the measurement results is provided. As a result of analyzes, a 5-score Likert type analytical thinking tendency scale consisting of 19-items was developed. According to the findings, it is determined that the analytical thinking tendency scale is a valid and a reliable assessment tool.


Keywords


Analytical thinking tendency; scale development; reliability; validity.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Aksu, G., Eser, M. T., Güzeller, C. O. (2017). Açımlayıcı ve doğrulayıcı faktör analizi ile yapısal eşitlik modeli uygulamaları. [Structural equation modeling applications with exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis]. Ankara: Detay Yayıncılık.

Barnes, J., Cote, J., Cudeck, R. & Malthouse, E. (2001). Factor analysis—checking assumptions of normality before conducting factor analysis. Journal of Consumer Psychology 10(1,2), 79–81.

Barrett, P. (2007). Structural equation modelling: Adjudging model fit. Personality and Individual Differences 42(5), 815-824.

Baumgartner, H., Homburg, C. (1996). Applications of structural equation modeling in marketing and consumer research: A review. International Journal of Research in Marketing 13(2), 139-161.

Bentler, P. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin 107(2), 238-246.

Bentler, P., & Bonett, D. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin 88(3), 588-606.

Charoenwongsak, K. (2003). Critical thinking. Bangkok: Successmedia Ltd.

Chaijaroen, S., Kanjug, I., Samat, C. (2006). Development of Learning Innovations That Enhancing Thinking Potential. Faculty of Education, Khonkaen University.

Brookhart, S. M. (2010). How to assess higher-order thinking skills in your classroom. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.

Browne, M., & Cudeck, R. (1992). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sociological Methods & Research 21(2), 230-258.

Byrne, B. (1989). A primer of LISREL. New York: Springer.

Cattell, R. B. (1978). The scientific use of factor analysis in behavioral and life sciences. New York: Plenum.

Chaffee, J. (1990). Thinking critically. Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston, MA.

Comrey, A. L., & Lee, H. B. (1992). A first course in factor analysis (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Cortina, J. M. (1993). What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications. Journal of Applied Psychology 78, 98-104.

Cottrell, S. (2005). Critical thinking skills. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

Çokluk, Ö., Şekercioğlu, G., ve Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2014). Sosyal bilimler için çok değişkenli istatistik SPSS ve LISREL uygulamaları (3.baskı). [Multivariate statistical applications with SPSS and LISREL in Social Sciences]. Ankara: Pegem Akademi Yayınları.

Dunn, T. J., Baguley, T., & Brunsden, V. (2014). From alpha to omega: A practical solution to the pervasive problem of internal consistency estimation. British Journal of Psychology 105(3), 399-412.

Dunteman, G. H. (1989). Principal components analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Dewey, J. (1933). How we think. A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process. Boston: Heath and Company.

Dewey R. A. (2007). Psychology: An introduction. California: Wadsworth.

Doll, W. J., Xia, W., Torkzadeh, G. (1994). A confirmatory factor analysis of the end-user computing satisfaction instrument. MIS Quarterly 18(4), 357–369.

Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with un observable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research 18(1), 39-50.

Gorsuch, R. L. (1983). Factor analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Güneş, F. (2012). Öğrencilerin Düşünme Becerilerini Geliştirme. [Developing students’ thinking skills]. Türklük Bilimi Araştırmaları-XXXII.

Gürkaynak, İ., Üstel, F., Gülgöz, S. (2008). Eleştirel Düşünme [Critical thinking]. Erg Raporları.

Kenny, D., Kaniskan, B., & McCoach, D. (2014). The performance of RMSEA in models with small degrees of freedom. Sociological Methods & Research 44(3), 486-507.

Kline, P. (1994). An easy guide to factor analysis. UK: Routledge.

Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3th edition). New York: The Guilford.

Lawshe, C. H. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology 28, 563–575.

Marsh, H. W., Balla J. R. & McDonald, R. P. (1988). Goodness of fit indexes in confirmatory factor analysis: The effect of sample size. Pshychological Bulletin 103, 391-410.

Maydeu-Olivares, A., Shi, D., & Rosseel, Y. (2017). Assessing fit in structural equation models: A Monte-Carlo Evaluation of RMSEA versus SRMR Confidence Intervals and tests of close fit. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal 25(3), 389- 402.

McDonald, R. P. (1999). Test theory: a unified treatment. Mahwah, NJ: LEA Publisher.

Mujtaba, A., Azam, S. & Rana, H. K. (2017). Performance evaluation of various data mining classification techniques that correctly classify banking transaction as fraudulent. Gub Journal of Science and Engineering 4 (1), 59-63.

Nisbett, R. E., Peng, K., Choi, I. & Norenzayan, A. (2001). Culture and systems of thought: Holistic versus analytic cognition. Psychological Review 108(2), 291-310.

Osburn, H. G. (2000). Coefficient alpha and related internal consistency reliability coefficients. Psychological Methods 5, 343–355.

Peters, G. J. Y. (2014). The alpha and the omega of scale reliability and validity: why and how to abandon Cronbach’s alpha and the route towards more comprehensive assessment of scale quality. European Health Psychologist 16(2), 56-69.

Piccone, A. V. (2009). A comparison of three computational procedures for solving the number of factors problem in exploratory factor analysis. Published Doctor of Philosophy dissertation, University of Northern Colorado.

Raiche, G., Riopel, M. and Blais, J.-G. (2006). Non graphical solutions for the Cattell's scree test. Paper presented at the Intrenational Annual meeting of the Psychometric Society, Montreal.

Revelle, W. & Rocklin, T. (1979). Very simple structure-alternative procedure for estimating the optimal number of interpretable factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research 14(4):403–414.

Revelle, W. & Zinbarg, R.E. (2009). Coefficients alpha, beta, omega and the glb: Comments on Sijtsma. Psychometrika 74(1), 145-154.

Scherer, R. F., Wiebe, F. A., Luther, D. C., & Adams, J. S. (1988). Dimensionality of coping: Factor stability using the ways of coping questionnaire. Psychological Reports 62(3), 763-770.

Schmitt, N. (1996). Uses and abuses of coefficient alpha. Psychological Assessment 8, 350-353.

Sharma, S., Mukherjee, S., Kumar, A., & Dillon, W. (2005). A simulation study to investigate the use of cutoff values for assessing model fit in covariance structure models. Journal Of Business Research 58(7).

Shields, C. (2012). Aristotle. Edward N. Zalta (ed.). The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. 15 Decemeber 2019 retrieved from http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2012/entries/aristotle/

Sijtsma, K., & Molenaar, I. W. (2002). Introduction to nonparametric ıtem response theory. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks.

Sternberg , R. J. (2006). The rainbow project: Enhancing the SAT through assessments of analytical,practical, and creative skills. Intelligence , 34:, 321 – 350.

Tanaka, J., & Huba, G. (1985). A fit index for covariance structure models under arbitrary GLS estimation. British Journal Of Mathematical And Statistical Psychology 38(2), 197- 201.

Thaneerananon, T., Triampo, W., & Nokkaew, A. (2016). Development of a test to evaluate students’analytical thinking based on fact versus opinion differentiation. International Journal of Instruction 9(2), 123-138.

Umay, A. ve Arıol, Ş. (2011). Baskın olarak bütüncül stilde düşünenlerle baskın olarak analitik stilde düşünenlerin problem çözme davranışlarının karşılaştırılması. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 30 (30), 27-37.

Umay, A. ve Kızıltuğ, Ş. (2007). Analitik ve Bütünsel Düşünenlerin Problem Çözme Davranışı Üzerine Bir Çalışma. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi ve Azerbaycan Devlet Pedagoji Üniversitesi Uluslararası Öğretmen Yetiştirme Politikaları ve Sorunları Sempozyumu, 12 – 14 Mayıs 2007, Bakü, Azerbeycan.

Üstündağ, T. (2005). Yaratıcılığa yolculuk (5. Baskı). [Journey to Creativity]. Ankara: PegemA Yayıncılık.

Veneziano L. & Hooper J. (1997). A method for quantifying content validity of health-related questionnaires. American Journal of Health Behavior 21 (1), s. 67-70.

Zinbarg, R. E., Revelle, W., Yovel, I., & Li, W. (2005). Cronbach’s α, Revelle’s, β and McDonalds ω: Their relations with each other and two alternative conceptualizations of reliability. Psychometrika 70(1).


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

 ISSN: 1305-3515