Profile of divergent thinking ability of elementary school student in thematic learning

Muna Fauziah, Sri Marmoah, Tri Murwaningsih, Kundharu Saddhono


The purpose of this study was to analyze the profile of the divergent thinking ability of elementary school students in thematic learning. This research was descriptive quantitative research. The sample of this study was fifth grade students with 48 students in two public elementary schools in Laweyan, Surakarta. Data collection techniques used was test. The instrument used was divergent thinking ability tests. The data validity technique used was construct and content validity. The data analysis used was statistic descriptive. The results found that the fluency indicator reaches a maximum value (76%), flexibility (74%), originality (68%), and elaboration is the lowest indicator (65.80%). Thus, it can be concluded that the divergent thinking skills of fifth grade elementary school students have different indicators and are divided into three categories. The introduction of training programs with open problems is quite an informative and promising way to complement integrated thematic learning in primary school.


Divergent thinking ability; Elementary school; Thematic learning

Full Text:



Acar, S., & Runco, M. A. (2014). Assessing Associative Distance Among Ideas Elicited by Tests of Divergent Thinking. Creativity Research Journal, 26(2), 229–238.

Addis, D. R., Pan, L., Musicaro, R., & Schacter, D. L. (2016). Divergent Thinking and Constructing Episodic Simulations. Memory, 24(1), 89–97.

Adnan, A., Beaty, R., Silvia, P., Spreng, R. N., & Turner, G. R. (2019). Creative Aging: Functional Brain Networks Associated with Divergent Thinking in Older and Younger Adults. Neurobiology of Aging, 75, 150–158.

Alduraby, H., & Liu, J. (2014). Using the Branching Story Approach to Motivate Students’ Interest in Reading 1. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 6(3), 463–478. Retrieved from

Alfonso-benlliure, V., & Romo, M. (2016). Creativity Development Trajectories in Elementary Education : Differences in Divergent and Evaluative Skills. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 19(3), 160–174.

An, D., Song, Y., & Carr, M. (2016). A Comparison of Two Models of Creativity: Divergent Thinking and Creative Expert Performance. Personallity and Individual Differences, 90, 78–84.

Antink-Meyer, A., & Lederman, N. G. (2015). Creative Cognition in Secondary Science: An exploration of divergent thinking in science among adolescents. International Journal of Science Education, 37(10), 1547–1563.

Apriliani, L. R., Suyitno, H., & Rochmad. (2016). Analyze of Mathematical Creative Thinking Ability Based On Math Anxiety in Creative Problem Solving Model with SCAMPER Technique. In M. P. Dr. Sigit Saptono, M. S. Dr. Masturi, M. C. Aji Purwinarko, & M. S. Dante Alighiri, S.Si. (Eds.), International Conference on Mathematics, Science, and Education 2016 (Vol. 2016, pp. 131–141). Semarang: Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences Semarang State University.

Arvyati, Ibrahim, M., & Irawan, A. (2015). Effectivity of Peer Tutoring Learning to Increase Mathematical Creative Thinking Ability of Class XI IPA SMAN 3 Kendari 2014. International Journal of Education and Research, 3(1), 613–628. Retrieved from

Baer, J., & Kaufman, J. C. (2008). Gender Differences in Creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 42(2), 5–35.

Cayirdag, N., & Acar, S. (2010). Relationship Between Styles of Humor and Divergent Thinking. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 3236–3240.

Çelik, P., Storme, M., & Forthmann, B. (2016). A New Perspective on the Link between Multiculturalism and Creativity : The Relationship between Core Value Diversity and Divergent Thinking. Learning and Individual Differences, 2(2), 1–9.

Chen, Y., Chang, W., & Kuo, C.-C. (2016). A Comparative Study of the Divergent Problem Solving Abilities of Mathematically and Scientifically Talented Students and Nongifted Students. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 22, 247–255.

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research Methods in Education (8th ed.). New York: Routledge.

Costa, S. da, Páez, D., Sánchez, F., Garaigordobil, M., & Gondim, S. (2015). Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology Personal Factors of Creativity : A Second Order Meta-Analysis. Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 31(3), 165–173.

Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Method Approaches (Fourth Edi, pp. 1–26). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publication.

Damon, W., Lerner, R. M., & Eisenberg, N. (2006). Handbook of Child Psychology. Unites States of Amerika: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Daniati, S. P., Subiyantoro, S., & Fadhilah, S. S. (2019). Natural School Culture as a Free And Fun Alternative Education in Building t he Students ’ Character Öğrencilerin Karakterinin İnşa Edilmesinde Ücretsiz Ve Eğlence Alternatif Eğitim Olarak Doğal Okul Kültürü. Elementary Education Online, 18(1), 331–342.

Dhayanti, D., Johar, R., & Zubainur, C. M. (2018). Improving Students’ Critical and Creative Thinking through Realistic Mathematics Education using Geometer’s Sketchpad. Journal of Research and Advances in Mathematic Education, 3(1), 25–35. 10.23917/jramathedu.v3i1.5618

Elisa, L., Hadiyanto., & Fitria, Y. (2019). Application pf learning Model Auditory, Intellectually, Repetition (AIR) to Increase Student Activity and Learning Outcomes in 2013 Curriculum Integrated Thematic Learning in Class IV SDN 06 Hand of Padang. International Journal of Educational Dynamics, 1(2), 156–162.

Gage, N. L., & Berliner, D. C. (1994). Pedagoginė Psichologija. Vilnius: Alma Littera.

Gower, M. D., & Shanks, R. A. (2014). Research Design-Qualitative, Quantitative, & Mixed Methods Approaches (4th ed., p. 273). California: Sage Publication.

Hoseinifar, J., Mohammad, M., & Rasoul, S. (2011). An Investigation of The Relation Between Creativity and Five Factors of Personality in Students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 30, 2037–2041.

Istiningsih. (2017). Empowerment of Teachers in Implementing Thematic Learning Method. Journal of Education and Practice, 8(3), 64–70.

Istiqomah, A., Perbowo, K. S., & Puwanto, S. E. (2018). Promoting Middle School Students’ Mathematical Creative Thinking Ability Using Scientific Approach. In Y. W. Purnomo, L. Roza, T. A. Aziz, K. S. Perbowo, & S. Ulfah (Eds.), 1st International Conference of Education on Sciences, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (ICE-STEM) (Vol. 948, pp. 1–6). :10.1088/1742-6596/948/1/012032

Jones, L. L., & Estes, Z. (2015). Convergent and Divergent Thinking in Verbal Analogy Convergent and Divergent Thinking in Verbal Analogy. Thinking & Reasoning, 21(4), 473–500.

Kadel, P. B. (2014). Role of Thinking in Learning. Journal of NELTA Surkhet, 4(December), 57–63.

Kassim, H. (2013). The relationship between Learning Styles, Creative Thinking Performance and Multimedia Learning Materials. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 97, 229–237.

Marriel, L. C., Assis, S. G., Avanci, J. Q., & Oliveira, R. V. (2006). Violencia Escolar E Auto-Estima de Adolescentes. Cadernos de Pesquisa, 36(127), 35–50.

Medvedev, S. V. (2014). Brain Organization of Creativity. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 94(2), 160.

Minister of Education and Culture. (2013). Minister of Education and Culture Regulations Number 65 of 2013 about Standards of Basıc and Medıum Educatıon Processes. Jakarta: Minister of Education and Culture.

Minister of Education and Culture. (2014). Minister of Education and Culture Regulation No. 57 of 2014 concerning 2013 Elementary School/Madrasah Ibtidaiyah Curriculum. Jakarta: Minister of Education and Culture.

Minister of Education and Culture. (2016). Minister of Education and Culture Regulations Number 20 of 2016 about The Basıc and Medıum Educatıon Competency Standards. Jakarta: Minister of Education and Culture.

Nasrullah, S., & Khan, M. S. (2015). The Impact of Time Management on the Students’ Academic Achievements. Journal of Literature, Languages and Linguistics, 11, 66–72.

OECD. (2016). Country Note: Indonesia. Program for international student assessment (PISA) Resul from PISA 2015. Retrieved from

Piaw, C. Y. (2014). Effects of Gender and Thinking Style on Students’ Creative Thinking Ability. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 5135–5139.

Pizzingrilli, P., Valenti, C., Cerioli, L., & Antonietti, A. (2015). Creative Thinking Skills From 6 To 17 Years As Assessed Through The WCR Test. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 191, 584–590.

Prihadi, K., & Chua, M. (2012). Students ’ Self-Esteem at School: The Risk, The Challenge, and The Cure. Journal of Education and Learning, 6(1), 1–14.

Pursitasari, I. D., Nuryanti, S., & Rede, A. (2015). Promoting of Thematic-based Integrated Science Learning on the Junior High School. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(20), 97–102.

Puspitasari, L., In’am, A., & Syaifuddin, M. (2019). Analysis of Students ’ Creative Thinking in Solving Arithmetic Problems. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 14(1), 49–60.

Razumnikova, O. M., & Yashanina, A. A. (2014). Personality Specific Differences in EEG Reactivity on Convergent and Divergent Thinking. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 94(2),160. http://doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2014.08.702

Samašonok, K., & Leškienė, B. (2015). Creativity Development : Theoretical and Practical Aspects. Journal of Creativity and Business Innovation, 1, 19–34. Retrieved from

Sanchez-ruiz, M., Pérez-gonzález, J. C., Romo, M., & Matthews, G. (2015). Divergent Thinking and Stress Dimensions. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 17, 102–116.

Setyono, B., & Widodo, H. P. (2019). The Representation of Multicultural Values in the Indonesian Ministry of Education and Culture-Endorsed EFL Textbook: a Critical Discourse Analysis. Intercultural Education, 00(00), 1–15.

Sharma, N., & Dhingra, R. (2018). Assesment of Opportunities Available to School Children for The Development of Divergent Thinking Ability. International Journal of Current Advanced Research, 7(9), 15301–15307.

Simon, A., & Bock, O. (2016). Influence of Divergent and Convergent Thinking on Visuomotor Adaptation in Young and Older Adults. Human Movement Science, 46, 23–29.

Sitorus, J., & Masrayati. (2016). Students’ Creative Thinking Process Stages: Implementation of Realistic Mathematics Education. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 22, 111–120.

Stoltzfus, G., Nibbelink, B. L., Vredenburg, D., & Thyrum, E. (2011). Gender, Gender Role, and Creativity. Social Behavior and Personality, 39(3), 425–432.

Unal, H., & Demir, Ä. (2009). Divergent Thinking and Mathematics Achievement in Turkey : Findings from The Programme for International Student Achievement. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1(1), 1767–1770.

Valente, R. R., & Berry, B. J. L. (2016). Effects of Perceived Discrimination on The School Satisfaction of Brazilian High School Graduates. Journal for Brazilian Studies, 5(1), 405–440.

Walid, M., Malik, A. M., Arifuddin, A., & Uyun, F. (2019). Development of Advanced Micro Devices Media to Enhance Student Concept Understanding in Thematic Learning. IOP Conf. Series: Journal of Physics: Conf. Series, 1157(1), 1–7.

Walker, B. R., & Jackson, C. J. (2014). How the Five Factor Model and Revised Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory Predict Divergent Thinking. Personality and Individual Differences, 57, 54–58.

Wijaya, A. (2017). The Relationships between Indonesian Fourth Graders’ Difficulties in Fractions and the Opportunity to Learn Fractions : A Snapshot of TIMSS Results. International Journal of Instruction, 10(4), 221–236.

Winarni, E. W., Lusa, H., & Dadi, S. (2018). The Impact of Thematic Learning Integrated ICT in Tabot Bengkulu as Cultural Ceremony toward Social Interaction Knowledge in Elementary School. Asian Journal of Education and Training, 4(2), 70–74.

Wronska, M. K., Bujacz, A., Gocłowska, M. A., Rietzschel, E. F., & Nijstad, B. A. (2018). Person-task fit : Emotional Consequences of Performing Divergent Versus Convergent Thinking Tasks Depend on Need for Cognitive Closure. Personality and Individual Differences, 1(September), 1–7.

Wu, J., & Albanese, D. L. (2013). Educational Psychology: An International Journal of Experimental Imagination and Creativity: Wellsprings and Streams of Education – the Taiwan Experience. Educational Psychology: An International Journal of Experimental Educational Psychology, 33(5), 561–581.

Wuryani, M. T., Roemintoyo, & Yamtinah, S. (2018a). Developing Thematic Textbooks Based on Character Education at Elementary School İlköğretimde Karakter Eğitimine Dayalı Tematik Ders Kitaplarının Geliştirilmesi. Elementary Education Online, 17(1), 268–276.

Wuryani, M. T., Roemintoyo, & Yamtinah, S. (2018b). Textbooks Thematic Based Character Education on Thematic Learning Primary School : An Influence. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 4(2), 75–81.

Yi, X., Plucker, J. A., & Guo, J. (2015). Modeling İnfluences on Divergent Thinking and Artistic Creativity. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 16, 62–68.

Zubaidah, S., Fuad, N. M., Mahanal, S., & Suarsini, E. (2017). Improving Creative Thinking Skills of Students through Differentiated Science Inquiry Integrated with Mind Map. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 14(4), 77–91.

Data citation



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

 ISSN: 1305-3515