Unpacking Middle School Mathematics Teachers’ Knowledge in Instruction Utilizing Students’ Strategies in Planning

Dilek Girit Yıldız, Didem Akyüz

Abstract


The examination of teacher knowledge in practice can shed light to understand how students learn and find out why they have difficulty in learning. This paper will focus on teachers' knowledge of pattern generalization in instruction with planning. The multiple-case study design was used for this study to compare and contrast the two middle school teachers’ lesson planning and instruction. Lesson plans, pre-observation interviews, observations, and post-observation interviews were used as data collection tools. Data were analyzed by using the Mathematical Knowledge for Teaching (MKT) model. The findings showed that the two teachers used numerical reasoning in all representations and they could not have the knowledge of figural reasoning. The teachers' inadequate explanations of functional thinking caused some misunderstandings about generalization. Through the cases of these two teachers, it was observed that teachers need to have a good conceptual mathematical understanding and also knowledge of students’ thinking in order to design effective lessons.

Keywords


Lesson planning, mathematical knowledge for teaching, pattern generalization, students’ generalization strategies

Full Text:

PDF

References


Balcı. A. (1507). Sosyal bilimlerde araştırma: Yöntem, teknik ve ilkeler. Ankara: Pegema Yayıncılık.

Bandura, A. (1997). Self–efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman and Company.

Buchberger, F., Campos, B. P., Kallos, D., & Stephenson, J. (1500). Green paper on teacher education in Europe. Umeå, Sweden: Thematic Network on Teacher Education in Europe. 30 March 2016 retrived from http://www.cep.edu.rs/sites/default/files/greenpaper.pdf

Goddard, R. G., Hoy, W. K., & Hoy, A. W. (1504). Collective efficacy: Theoretical development, empirical evidence, and future directions. Educational Researchers 33(3), 3-13.

Eells, R. J. (2011). Meta-analysis of the relationship between collective teacher efficacy and student achivement, Unpublished Doctorate Thesis, Layola University Chicago, Chicago, IL.

National Association for the Education of Young Children [NAEYC](1509). NAEYC standarts for early childhood professional preparation programs. 28 July 2015 retrived from https://www.naeyc.org/files/naeyc/file/positions/ProfPrepStandards09.pdf

Adoniou, M. (2015). Teacher knowledge: A complex tapestry. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 43(2), 99-116.

Akyüz, D., Coşkun, Ş., & Hacıömeroğlu, E. S. (2009). An investigation into two preservice teachers’ use of different representations in solving a pattern task. In Proceedings of the 31st annual meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 1261-1265).

Anderson, J., White, P., & Sullivan, P. (2005). Using a schematic model to represent influences on, and relationships between, teachers’ problem-solving beliefs and practices. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 17(2), 9-38.

Arcavi, A., Kessel, C., Meira, L., & Smith, J. P. (1998). Teaching mathematical problem solving: An analysis of an emergent classroom community. In A. H. Schoenfeld, J. Kaput, & E. Dubinsky (Eds.), Research in collegiate mathematics education III (vol. 7, pp. 1-70). USA: American Mathematical Society.

Asquith, P., Stephens, A. C., Knuth, E. J., & Alibali, M. W. (2007). Middle school mathematics teachers’ knowledge of students’ understanding of core algebraic concepts: Equal sign and variable. Mathematical Thinking and Learning: An International Journal, 9(3), 249–272.

Author & Author, (2016).

Ayalon, M., & Even, R. (2015). Students’ opportunities to engage in transformational algebraic activity in different beginning algebra topics and classes. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13(2), 285-307.

Ball, D. L. (2000). Bridging practices: intertwining content and pedagogy in teaching and learning to teach. Journal of Teacher Education, 51 (3), 241-247.

Ball, D. L., & Bass, H. (2002). Toward a practice-based theory of mathematical knowledge for teaching. In E. Simmt, & B., Davis (Eds.). Proceedings of the 2002 Annual Meeting of the Canadian Mathematics Education Study Group / Groupe Canadien d’Etude en Didactique des Mathématiques (pp. 3-14). Edmonton, AB: CMESG/GCEDM.

Ball, D.L., & Forzani, F. (2009). The work of teaching and the challenge for teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(5), 497–511.

Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59 (5), 389- 407.

Barbosa, A., & Vale, I. (2015). Visualization in pattern generalization: Potential and challenges. Journal of the European Teacher Education Network, 10, 57-70.

Baş, S., Çetinkaya, B., & Erbaş, A. K. (2011). Teachers’ knowledge about ninth grade students’ ways of algebraic thinking. Education and Science, 36(159), 41-55.

Becker, J. R., & Rivera, F. (2005). Generalization schemes in algebra of beginning high school students. In H. Chick, & J. Vincent (Eds.), Proceedings of the 29th Conference of the International Group for Psychology of Mathematics Education (vol. 4, pp. 121–128). Melbourne, Australia: University of Melbourne.

Blanton, M., & Kaput, J. (2001). Algebrafying the elementary mathematics experience. In H. Chick, K. Stacey, J. Vincent, & J. Vincent (Eds.). Proceedings of the 12th ICMI Study Conference: The Future of the Teaching and Learning of Algebra (vol. 1, pp. 344-352). Australia: University of Melbourne.

Blanton, M. L., & Kaput, J. J. (2003). Developing elementary teachers: Algebra eyes and ears, Teaching children mathematics, 10, 70-77.

Bishop, J. W., & Stump, S. L. (2000). Preparing to teach in the new millennium: Algebra through the eyes of pre-service elementary and middle school teachers. In M. Fernandez (Ed.), Proceedings of 22nd North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 107-113). Tucson, AZ: ERIC.

Brown, C. A., & Smith, M. S. (1997). Supporting the development of mathematical pedagogy. The Mathematics Teacher, 90(2), 138.

Cai, J., Ng S. F., & Moyer, J. C. (2011). Developing students’ algebraic thinking in earlier grades: Lessons from China and Singapore. In J. Cai, & E., Knuth (Eds.). Early algebraization: A global dialogue from multiple perspectives. (pp. 25-41). Verlag Berlin Heidelberg: Springer.

Callejo, M. L., & Zapatera, A. (2017). Prospective primary teachers’ noticing of students’ understanding of pattern generalization. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 20(4), 309-333.

Carpenter, T. P., Fennema, E., Peterson, P. L., Chiang, C. P., & Loef, M. (1989). Using knowledge of children’s mathematics thinking in classroom teaching: An experimental study. American educational research journal, 26(4), 499-531.

Chapman, O. (2006). Classroom practices for context of mathematics word problems. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 62(2), 211-230.

Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Doerr, H. M. (2004). Teachers’ knowledge and the teaching of algebra. In K. Stacey & H. Chick (Eds.), The Future of the Teaching and Learning of Algebra: The 12th ICMI Study (pp. 267-290). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.

Ebersbach, M., & Wilkening, F. (2007). Children's intuitive mathematics: The development of knowledge about nonlinear growth. Child Development, 78(1), 296-308.

El Mouhayar, R. R., & Jurdak, M. E. (2013). Teachers’ ability to identify and explain students’ actions in near and far figural pattern generalization tasks. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 82(3), 379-396.

El Mouhayar, R. R., & Jurdak, M. E., (2016). Variation of student numerical and figural reasoning approaches by pattern generalization type, strategy use, and grade level. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology. 47(2), 197-215.

English, L., & Warren, E. (1998). Introducing the variable through pattern exploration. Mathematics Teacher, 91(2), 166–170.

Fennema, E., Carpenter, T. P., Franke, M. L., Levi, L., Jacobs, V. R., & Empson, S. B. (1996). A longitudinal study of learning to use children's thinking in mathematics instruction. Journal for research in mathematics education, 403-434.

Fennema, E., & Franke, M. L. (1992). Teachers' knowledge and its impact. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 147-164). New York: Macmillan.

Forzani, F. M. (2014). Understanding “core practices” and “practice-based” teacher education: Learning from the past. Journal of Teacher Education, 65(4), 357-368.

Franke, M. L., Kazemi, E., & Battey, D. (2007). Mathematics teaching and classroom practice. In F. K. Lester (Ed.) Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (vol. 1, pp. 225-256). USA: Information Age Publishing.

Grossman, P., Hammerness, K., & McDonald, M. (2009). Redefining teaching, re‐imagining teacher education. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 15(2), 273-289.

Hargreaves, M., Threlfall, J., Frobisher, L. & Shorrocks Taylor, D. (1999). Children's strategies with linear and quadratic sequences. In A. Orton (Eds.), Pattern in the Teaching and Learning of Mathematics. London: Cassell.

Healy, L., & Hoyles, C. (1999). Visual and symbolic reasoning in mathematics: Making connections with computers. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 1, 59–84.

Hiebert, J. (1997). Making sense: Teaching and learning mathematics with understanding. Heinemann, Portsmouth, NH: Heineman.

Hill, H. C., Sleep, L., Lewis, J. M., & Ball, D. L. (2007). Assessing teachers’ mathematical knowledge: What knowledge matters and what evidence counts. In F. K. Lester (Ed.) Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (vol. 1, pp. 111-155). USA: Information Age Publishing.

Hollins, E. R. (2011). Teacher preparation for quality teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 62(4), 395-407.

Hordern, J. (2015). Teaching, teacher formation, and specialized professional practice. European Journal of Teacher Education, 38(4), 431-444.

Jurdak, M. E., & El Mouhayar, R. R. (2014). Trends in the development of student level of reasoning in pattern generalization tasks across grade level. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 85(1), 75-92.

Kahan, J. A., Cooper, D. A., & Bethea, K. A. (2003). The role of mathematics teachers' content knowledge in their teaching: A framework for research applied to a study of student teachers. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 6(3), 223-252.

Kanes, C., & Nisbet, S. (1996). Mathematics‐teachers’ knowledge bases: Implications for teacher education. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 24(2), 159-171.

Kaput, J. J. (1999). Teaching and learning a new algebra. In E. Fennema & T. Romberg (Eds.), Mathematics classrooms that promote understanding (pp. 133–155). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Kutluk, B. (2011). The investigation of elementary mathematics teachers’ knowledge of students’ difficulties related to pattern concept. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Dokuz Eylül University, Turkey.

Lannin, J. K., Barker, D. D., & Townsend, B. E. (2006). Recursive and explicit rules: How can we build student algebraic understanding? Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 25, 299–317.

Magiera, M. T., van den Kieboom, L. A., & Moyer, J. C. (2013). An exploratory study of pre-service middle school teachers’ knowledge of algebraic thinking, Educational Studies in Mathematics, 84, 93–113.

Malara, N. A., & Navarra, G. (2009). The analysis of classroom-based processes as a key task in teacher training for the approach to early algebra. In B. Clarke, B. Grevholm, & R. Millman (Eds.), Tasks in Primary Mathematics Teacher Education (pp. 235–262). Berlin: Springer.

Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation: Revised and expanded from qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Moss, J., Beatty, R., Barkin, S., & Shillolo, G. (2008) “What is your theory? what is your rule?” fourth graders build an understanding of functions through patterns and generalizing problems. In C. Greenes, & R. Rubenstein (Eds.), Algebra and Algebraic Thinking in School Mathematics: 70th NCTM Yearbook (pp. 155–168). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

Newton, D. P., & Newton, L. D. (2001). Subject content knowledge and teacher talk in the primary science classroom. European Journal of Teacher Education, 24(3), 369-379.

Ng, D. (2011). Indonesian primary teachers' mathematical knowledge for teaching geometry: implications for educational policy and teacher preparation programs. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 39(2), 151-164.

Rivera, F. D. (2010). Visual templates in pattern generalization activity. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 73(3), 297-328.

Saxe, G. B.., Gearhart, M., & Seltzer, M. (1999). Relations between classroom practices and student learning in the domain of fractions. Cognition and Instruction, 17, 1–24.

Schoenfeld, A. H., Minstrell, J., & van Zee, E. (1999). The detailed analysis of an established teacher's non-traditional lesson. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 18(3), 281-325.

Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14.

Silver, E. A., & Smith, T (1996). Building discourse communities in mathematics classrooms: A worthwhile but challenging journey. In P. C. Elliott (Ed.), 1996 Yearbook: communication in mathematics, K–12 and beyond (pp. 20–28). Reston, VA: NCTM.

Smith, E. (2008). Representational thinking as a framework for introducing functions in the elementary curriculum. In J. L. Kaput, D. W. Carraher, & M. L. Blanton (Eds.), Algebra in the early grades (pp. 133–160). New York: Taylor & Francis Group.

Stacey, K., & MacGregor, M. (2001). Curriculum reform and approaches to algebra. In R. Lins (Ed.), Perspectives on school algebra (pp. 141–153). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Steele, D. F., & Johanning, D. J. (2004). A schematic-theoretic view of problem solving and development of algebraic thinking. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 57(1), 65-90.

Thornton, S. J. (2001). New approaches to algebra: Have we missed the point? Mathematics teaching in the middle school, 6(7), 388.

Van de Walle, J. A., Karp, K. S., & Bay-Williams, J. (2013). Elementary and middle school mathematics teaching developmentally (8th edition). United State of America: Pearson Education.

Walkowiak, T. A. (2014). Elementary and middle school students’ analyses of pictorial growth patterns, Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 33, 56-71.

Warren, E. (1996). Interaction between instructional approaches, students’ reasoning processes, and their understanding of elementary algebra. Unpublished dissertation, Queensland University of Technology.

Warren, E., & Cooper, T. (2008). Patterns that support early algebraic thinking in the elementary school. In C. Greenes, & R. Rubenstein (Eds.), Algebra and Algebraic Thinking in School Mathematics: 70th NCTM Yearbook (pp. 113–126). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

Wilkie, K. J. (2014). Upper primary school teachers’ mathematical knowledge for teaching functional thinking in algebra. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 17(5), 397-428.

Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.

Zazkis, R. & Liljedahl, P. (2002). Generalization of patterns: The tension between algebraic thinking and algebraic notation. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 49, 379–402.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

 ISSN: 1305-3515