Teachers' opinions on the effectiveness of digital technology in the realization of cognitive objectives

Dinçer Temelli, Çavuş Şahin, Osman Yılmaz Kartal

Abstract


Educational technologies are used as an effective tool in achieving educational objectives. In this research, it is aimed to examine teachers' opinions about the effectiveness level of digital technology in acquiring cognitive objectives. The research was conducted as the sequential explanatory mixed research design. “A questionnaire of technology beliefs for cognitive objectives” and semi-structured interview form developed by the researchers were applied. At the end of the research, it was concluded that teachers' views about the effectiveness of digital technologies in achieving cognitive objectives were generally high. Smart boards and Web 2.0 are thought the most effective tool by the teachers. Respectively computer, tablet pc, smartphone and Web 1.0 come next in that list. It has been seen that smart board and Web 2.0 technologies play an effective role in the acquisition of cognitive objectives by enabling the development of different parameters.

Keywords


Cognitive taxonomy, educational objectives, technology

Full Text:

PDF

References


Akkoyunlu, B. (2002). Öğretmenlerin internet kullanımı ve bu konudaki öğretmen görüşleri üzerine bir çalışma. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 22, 1-8.

Akpınar, E. (2003). Ortaöğretim coğrafya dersleri yazılı sınav sorularının bilişsel düzeyleri. Erzincan Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 5(1), 13-21.

Al-Rahmi, W. M. & Othman, M. S. (2013). The impact of social media use on academic performance among university students: A pilot study. Journal Of Information Systems Research And Innovation, 4(2), 1–10.

Alp, Y. & Kaleci, D. (2018). YouTube sitesindeki videoların eğitim materyali olarak kullanımına ilişkin öğrenci görüşleri. International Journal of Active Learning (IJAL), 3(1), 57-68.

Alston, A. J. & Miller, W.W. (2002). Analyzing the barriers and benefits toward ınstructional technology ınfusion in north carolina and virginia secondary agricultural education curricula. Journal of Agricultural Education, 43(1).

Anderson, L. W. (2005). Objectives, evaluations and the ımprovement of educaiton. Studies in Education Evaluation, 31, 102-113.

Anderson, L. W. (Ed.), Krathwohl, D. (Ed.), Airasian, P. W., Cruikshank, K. A., Mayer, R. E., Pintrich, P. R., Raths, J., Wittrock, M.C. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: Longman.

Anderson, L. W. (Ed.), Krathwohl, D. R. (Ed.), Airasian, P. W., Cruikshank, K. A., Mayer, R. E., Pintrich, P. R., Raths, J., Wittrock, M.C. (2014). Öğrenme öğretim ve değerlendirme ile ilgili bir sınıflama (2. baskı) (Çev. D. A. Özçelik). Ankara: Pegem.

Amer, A. (2006). Reflections on Bloom’s revised taxonomy. Electronic Journal of Research in Education Psychology, 4(8), 213-230.

Amiri, R. & Sharifi, M. (2014). The influence of using interactive whiteboard on writings of EFL students regarding adverbs. Proceedings of the Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 242–250.

Arı, A. (2011). Bloom’un gözden geçirilmiş bilişsel alan taksonomisinin Türkiye’de ve uluslararası alanda kabul görme durumu. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 11(2), 749-772.

Arı, A. (2013). Bilişsel alan sınıflamasında yenilenmiş Bloom, SOLO, Fink, Dettmer taksonomileri ve uluslararası alanda tanınma durumları. Uşak Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 6(2), 259- 290.

Arkün Kocadere, S. & Aşkar, P. (2013). Sosyal medya araçlarının katkıları ve kullanım sıklıkları: Öğretmenlik uygulaması örneği. İlköğretim Online, 12(4).

Arseven, A., Şimşek, U. & Güden, M. (2016). Coğrafya dersi yazılı sınav sorularının yenilenmiş Bloom taksonomisi’ne göre analizi. CÜ Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 40(1), 243-258.

Bagdasarov, Z., Luo, Y. & Wu, W. (2017). The influence of tablet-based technology on the development of communication and critical thinking skills: An interdisciplinary study. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 49, 55-72.

Baş, T. & Tüzün, H. (2007). Aday öğretmenlerin alan eğitiminde web günlüklerinin (blog’ların) kullanılması. Uluslararası Öğretmen Yetiştirme Politikaları ve Sorunları Konferansı Bildiriler içinde (34-38). Bakü, Azerbaycan.

Berkdemir, B. & Selim, Y. (2008). Revize edilmiş bloom taksonomisi ve cebir öğrenme alanı örneğinde uygulaması. Erzincan Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 10(2), 185-196.

Bloom, B. S. (Ed.) (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives. Handbook I: The cognitive domain. New York: David McKay.

Bonastre, O. M., Penalver Benavent, A., & Belmonte, F. N. (2006). Pedagogical use of tablet pc for active and collaborative learning. In IEEE International Professional Communication Conference, 214-218.

Bringula, R.P., Batalla, M.Y.C., Moraga, S.D., Ochengco, L.D.R., Ohagan, K. N.& Lansigan, R.R. (2012). School choice of computing students: A comparative perspective from two universities. Creative Education, 3, 1070-1078.

Bümen, N. T. (2006). Program geliştirmede bir dönüm noktası: Yenilenmiş Bloom taksonomisi, Eğitim ve Bilim, 31(142), 3-14.

Büyükalan, S. (2007). Soru sorma sanatı (2.basım). Ankara: Nobel.

Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç-Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş. & Demirel, F. (2012). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri (13. Baskı). Ankara: Pegem A Akademi.

Chen, H. R., Chiang, C. H. & Lin, W.S. (2013). Learning effects of interactive whiteboard pedagogy for students in Taiwan from the perspective of multiple intelligences. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 49(2), 173-187, doi: 10.2190/EC.49.2.c

Cheng, I. N. Y., Chan, J. K. Y., Kong, S. S. Y. & Leung, K. M. Y. (2016). Effectiveness and obstacle of using Facebook as a tool to facilitate student-centred learning in higher education. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 17(2), 1-14.

Ching, Y. -H., & Hsu, Y. -C. (2013). Collaborative learning using VoiceThread in an online graduate course. Knowledge Management & ELearning, 5(3), 298–314.

Clark, D.B., Tanner-Smith, E.E. & Killingsworth, S.S. (2016). Digital games, design, and learning: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 86(1), 79-122.

Clark, R. (1983). Reconsidering research on learning from media.Review of Educational Research, 53(4), 445–449.

Clark, R. (1994). Media will never influence learning.Educational Technology, Research and Development, 42(2), 21–29.

Creswell, J. W. (2017). Araştırma deseni: Nitel, nicel ve karma yöntem yaklaşımları (3.baskı) (Çev. S. B. Demir). Ankara: Eğiten Kitap.

Çakır, R. & Tan, S. S. (2017). Development of educational applications on the social network of facebook and its effects on students’ academic achievement. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 17(5), 1525–1546.

Çepni, S., Ayas, A., Johnson, D. & Turgut, M.F. (1997). Fizik Öğretimi, YÖK / Dünya Bankası Milli Eğitimi Geliştirme Projesi Hizmet Öncesi Öğretmen Eğitimi, Ankara.

Çoban, Ö., Saray, A. & Ulutan, E. (2017). Fatih Projesi Eğitimlerinin Değerlendirilmesi. T.C. MEB Yenilik ve Eğitim Teknolojileri Genel Müdürlüğü.

Demirel, Ö. (2015). Eğitimde program geliştirme (24. baskı). Ankara: Pegem.

Ekici, M. & Kıyıcı, M. (2012). Sosyal ağların eğitim bağlamında kullanımı. Uşak Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 5(2), 156–167.

Enriquez, A. G. (2010). Enhancing student performance using tablet computers. College Teaching, 58(3), 77–84.

Ersin, P. & Bayyurt, Y. (2015). Odak grup görüşmeleri. F. N., Seggie ve Y. Bayyurt (Editörler), Nitel araştırma: Yöntem, teknik, analiz ve yaklaşımları (ss.202-218). Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık.

Ertürk, S. (1972). Eğitimde program geliştirme. Ankara: Meteksan.

Falloon, G. (2015). What’s the difference? Learning collaboratively using iPads in conventional classrooms. Computers & Education, 84, 62–77.

Forehand, M. (2010). Bloom’s taxonomy: Original and revised. In M. Orey (Ed.), Emerging perspectives on learning, teaching, and technology. 10 March 2017 retrieved from

https://textbookequity.org/Textbooks/Orey_Emergin_Perspectives_Learning.pdf

Gleason, B. W. & Heath, M. K., (2019). Tools, processes, participation: Social media for learning, teaching, and social change. Education Conference Presentations, Posters and Proceedings. SITE 2019 (March 18-22)- Las Vegas, NV, United States,

Gorgievski, N., Stroud, R., Truxaw, M. & DeFranco, T. (2005). Tablet PC: A preliminary report on a tool for teaching calculus. International Journal for Technology in Mathematics Education,12(3), 95-102.

Gök, T. (2012). Real-time assessment of problem-solving of physics students using computer-based technology. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 43, 210-221.

Greene, M. & Kirpalani, N. (2013). Using interactive whiteboards in teaching retail mathematics. Marketing Education Review, 23(1) 49-53.

Haddad, W.D. & Draxler, A. (2002). Technologies for education, potentials, parameters and prospects. Washington DC: UNESCO Knowledge Enterprise. 03 March 2020 retrieved from https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000119129

Hasting, N.B.& Tracey, M.W. (2005). Does media affect learning? Where are we now? TechTrends, 49(2), 28-30.

Hsu, Y., Ching, Y. & Grabowski, B.L. (2014). Web 2.0 applications and practices for learning through collaboration. In J.M. Spector,

M.D. Merrill, J. Elen, & M.J. Bishop (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (4th edition) (pp.747–758). New York: Springer.

İşman, A. (2015). Öğretim teknolojileri ve materyal tasarımı (5. baskı). Ankara: Pegem.

Jackson, A., Gaudet, L., McDaniel, L. & Brammer, D. (2009). Curriculum integration: The use of technology to support learning. Journal of College Teaching and Learning, 6(7), 71-78.

Jang S. -J. (2010). Integrating the interactive whiteboard and peer coaching to develop the TPACK of secondary science teachers. Computers & Education, 55(4), 1744-1751.

Karasar, N. (2005). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemi (14. Baskı). Ankara: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım.

Katwibun, H. (2014). Using an interactive whiteboard in vocabulary teaching. Proceedings of the Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 674–678.

Kaya, M. & Karamustafaoğlu, O. (2015). “Analysis of TSKT Questions on Science Teaching In 2013 PPSE According to Reconstructing of Bloom Taxonomy”, Eurasian Journal of Physics & Chemistry Education, 7(1), 29-36. DOI: 10.12973/ejpce.2015.00084a

Kennewell, S. & Beauchamp, G. (2007). The features of interactive whiteboards and their influence on learning. Learning Media and Technology, 32(3), 227-241.

Kozma, R. (1991). Learning with media.Review of Educational Research, 61(2), 179–211.

Kozma, R. (1994). Will media influence learning? Reframing the debate.Educational Technology, Research and Development, 42(2), 7–19.

Krathwhol, D. R. (2002). A revision of Bloom taxonomy: An overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(4), 212-264.

Kershner, R., Mercer, N., Warwick, P., & Kleine, J. S. (2010). Can the interactive whiteboard support young children’s collaborative communication and thinking in classroom science activities? International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 5(4), 359-383. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11412-010-9096-2

Kıcı, D. & Dilmen, N.E. (2014). Sosyal paylaşım ağlarının işbirlikli öğrenmede kullanımı: bir facebook uygulaması. Marmara Üniversitesi Öneri Dergisi, 11(41), s.343-356.

Koehler, A. A. & Ertmer, P. A. (2016). Using Web 2.0 tools to facilitate case-based instruction: Considering the possibilities. Educational Technology, 56(1), 3-13.

Kurtuluş, A. & Kılıç, R. (2009). The effects of WebQuest assisted cooperative learning method on the achievement towards. e-Journal of New World Sciences Academy, 4(1), 62-70.

Kuşçu, M. & Arslan, H. (2015). Evaluation of effectıveness of vitamın teacher portal. European Scientific Journal, 11(10), pp. 226-239.

Lever-Duffy, J. & McDonald, J. B. (2008). Teaching and learning with technology (3rd Edition). Boston, MA: Pearson Education.

Lin, C. P., Liu, K. P. & Niramitranon, J. (2008). Tablet PC to support collaborative learning: An empirical study of English vocabulary learning. In Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Wireless, Mobile, and Ubiquitous Technology in Education (pp. 47-51). Beijing, China: IEEE Press.

Lopez, O. (2010). The digital learning classroom: Improving English language learners academic success in mathematics and readingusing interactive whiteboard technology. Computers & Education, 54, 901-915.

Luo Y-F. & Yang, S. C. (2016). The effect of the interactive functions of whiteboards on elementary students’ learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 54(5), 680–700.

McLoughlin, C.E. & Alam, S. L. (2014). Case study of ınstructor scaffolding using web 2.0 tools to teach social ınformatics. Journal of Information Systems Education, 25(2), 125-136.

MEB, (2015). 2014-2015 Eğitim öğretim yılı 2. dönem ortak sınav bilgileri. 05 November 2017 retrieved from

http://odsgm.meb.gov.tr/test/analizler/docs/2014-2015-2-Donem-Ortak-Sinavlar-Genel-Bilgiler.pdf

MEB, (2016a). 2015-2016 Eğitim öğretim yılı 1. dönem ortak sınav bilgileri. 05 November 2017 retrieved from http://odsgm.meb.gov.tr/test/analizler/docs/2015-2016-1-Donem-Ortak-Sinavlar-Sayisal-Bilgiler.pdf

MEB, (2016b). 2015-2016 Eğitim öğretim yılı 2. dönem ortak sınav bilgileri. 05 November 2017 retrieved from

http://odsgm.meb.gov.tr/test/analizler/docs/2015-2016OrtakSinavlar2.DonemSayisalBilgiler.pdf

MEB, (2017). 2016-2017 Eğitim öğretim yılı II. dönem merkezi ortak sınavı test ve madde istatistikleri. 05 November 2017 retrieved from https://odsgm.meb.gov.tr/meb_iys_dosyalar/2017_06/12171001_2017_2.doYnem_Merkezi_Ortak_SYnavY_genel_bilgiler_raporu_12.06.2017.pdf

Miles, M. B. & Huberman A.M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. (2nd Edition). Calif: Sage Publications.

Newby T. J., Stepich D. A., Lehman J. D. & Russell J. D. (2006). Educational technology for teaching and learning (3rd edition). New Jersey: Pearson Merrill Prentice Hall

OECD (2016). PISA 2015 Results (Volume I): Excellence and Equity in Education, PISA. Paris: OECD Publishing. doi: 10.1787/9789264266490-en

ÖSYM (2017). 2017-Lisans yerleştirme sınavları (2017-lys) sonuçları. 15 January 2018 retrieved from https://dokuman.osym.gov.tr/pdfdokuman/2017/osys/LYS/SayisalBilgiler11072017.pdf

ÖSYM (2018). 2018-YKS Değerlendirme Raporu. 03 March 2019 retrieved from

https://dokuman.osym.gov.tr/pdfdokuman/2018/GENEL/YKSDegrapor06082018.pdf

ÖSYM (2019). 2019 YKS Sayısal Bilgiler. 03 March 2019 retrieved from

https://dokuman.osym.gov.tr/pdfdokuman/2019/YKS/sayisalbilgiler18072019.pdf

Özabacı, N. & Olgun A. (2011). Bilgisayar destekli fen bilgisi öğretiminin fen bilgisi dersine ilişkin tutum, bilişüstü beceriler ve başarısı üzerine bir çalışma. Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 10(37), 93-107.

Özenç, E. G. & Özmen, Z. K. (2014). Akıllı tahtayla işlenen fen ve teknoloji dersinin öğrencilerin başarısına ve derse karşı tutumlarına etkisi. Türkiye Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi,18(2), 137-152.

Pimmer, C., Chipps, J., Brysiewicz, P., Walters, F., Linxen, S. & Gröhbiel, U. (2016). Supervision on social media: Use and perception of facebook as a research education tool in disadvantaged areas. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(5), 201-214.

Roblyer M. D. (2006). Integrating educational technology into teaching (4th edition). New Jersey: Pearson Merrill Prentice Hall.

Sakız, G., Özden, B., Aksu, D. & Şimşek, Ö. (2014). Fen ve teknoloji dersinde akıllı tahta kullanımının öğrenci başarısına ve dersin işlenişine yönelik tutuma etkisi. Atatürk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 18(3), 257-274.

Seels, B. B. & Richey, R. C. (1994). Instructional technology: The definition and domains of the field. Washington DC: Association for Educational Communications and Technology (Chapter 1).

Senemoğlu, N. (2005). Gelişim öğrenme ve öğretim (12.baskı). Ankara: Gazi Kitabevi.

Šliogerienė, J., Masoodi, M. & Gulbinskienė, D. (2016). Facebook as a tool in university english language education. Acta Paedagogica Vilnensia, 36, 34-42.

Soleimani, H., & Kheiri, S. (2016). An Evaluation of TEFL postgraduates' testing classroom activities and assignments based on Bloom's revised taxonomy. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 6(4), 861.

Sönmez, V. (2004). Program geliştirmede öğretmen el kitabı. Ankara: Anı Yayınları.

Şahin Ç. & Kartal O. Y. (2013). Sınıf öğretmeni adaylarının sınıf öğretmeni yetiştirme programı hakkındaki görüşleri. Uşak Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 6(1), 164-190.

Şahinel, S. (2002). Eleştirel düşünme. Ankara: Pegema.

Taş, U. E., Arıcı, Ö., Özarkan, H. B. & Özgürlük, B. (2016). PISA 2015 ulusal raporu. 05 January 2018 retrieved from http://odsgm.meb.gov.tr/test/analizler/docs/PISA/PISA2015_Ulusal_Rapor.pdf

Tekin, H. (2009). Eğitimde ölçme ve değerlendirme (19.baskı). Ankara: Yargı.

Tienken, C. H. & Wilson, M. J. (2007). The impact of computer assisted instruction on seventh-grade students’ mathematıcs achievement. Planning and Changing, 38(3&4), 181–190.

Tikkanen, G. & Aksela, M. (2012). Analysis of Finnish chemistry matriculation examinations questions According to cognitive complexity. NORDINA, 8(3), 258–268.

Trucano, M. & Dykes, G. (2017) Building and sustaining national educational agencies: Lessons, models and case studies from around the world. Washington, DC: The World Bank.

UNESCO, (2020). Information and communication technology (ICT) in education. 03 March 2020 retrieved from https://learningportal.iiep.unesco.org/en/issue-briefs/improve-learning/curriculum-and-materials/information-and-communication-technology-ict

Wall, K., Higgins, S. & Smith, H. (2005). The visual helps me understand the complicated things’: pupil views of teaching and learning with interactive whiteboards. British Educational Communications and Technology Agency, 36(5), 851–867.

Worldbank (2020). Digital Technologies in Education. 03 March 2020 retrieved from https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/edutech#4

Xin, J.F. & Sutman, X. F. (2011). Using the smart board in teaching social stories to students with autism. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 43(4), 18-24.

Yıldırım, A., Özgürlük, B., Parlak, B., Gönen, E., & Polat, M. (2016). TIMSS 2015 Ulusal matematik ve fen ön raporu. 05 January 2018 retrieved from http://timss.meb.gov.tr/wp-content/uploads/TIMSS_2015_Ulusal_Rapor.pdf

Yıldırım, A. & Şimşek, H. (2016). Soysal bilimlerde nitel araştırıma yöntemleri (10.baskı). Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık

Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th Ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

 ISSN: 1305-3515