Analysis of mathematical problem-solving skills viewed from ınitial ability and gender differences in an elementary school

Heni - Nurhayanti, Riyadi - Riyadi, Budi - Usodo

Abstract


This study aims to describe the mathematical problem solving skills of students based on gender. This research is a descriptive qualitative study. Sampling was done by purposive sampling. The subjects of this study were fifth grade students of SDN Sinduadi 1 Sleman Yogyakarta in the academic year 2018/2019. The technique of collecting data used are testing and interview methods to get data about the process of making information done by students in solving mathematical problems. The instruments used to collect data are solving test and interview guidelines. The results of this study indicate male and female students who have low initial mathematical ability have not been able to apply mathematical problem solving with Polya steps. Those students are include in very poor category. Where Polya steps are 1) understanding the problem, 2) plan problem solving, 3) solve the problem according to the plan, and 4) re-checking. Therefore, special learning strategies and habituation are needed for students to solve the problem completely. In conclusion there are differences between male and female in problem solving but not so significantly.

 


Keywords


gender, mathematics, problem solving, skills

Full Text:

PDF

References


References

Alacacı, C., & Dogruel, M. (2012). Solving a stability problem by polya’s four steps. International Journal of Electronics Mechanical and Mechatronics Engineering, 1(1), 19–28.

Ardiyanti, Bharata, H. & Yunarti, T. (2014). Analisis kesalahan dalam mengerjakan soal cerita matematika. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Unila, 2(7), 1-9.

Arikunto, S. (2013). Prosedur penelitian: Suatu pendekatan praktik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Brandon, P..(1985). The superiority of girls over boys in mathematics achievment in hawaii. Paper presented at annual meeting of American Educational Research Association 10.

Bell, F. H. (1978). Teaching and learning mathematics (in secondary school). New York: WMC Brown Company Publishing Town.

Brunner, M., Krauss, S., & Kunter, M. (2007). Gender differences in mathematics: Does the story need to be rewritten? Intelligence, 36(5), 403-421.

Brown, L. I. & Kanyongo, G. Y. (2010). Gender Differences in mathematics performance in trinidad and tobago: Examining affective factors. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 5(3), 113-130.

Bursal, M. (2013). Longitudinal investigation of elementary students’ science academic achievement in 4-8th grades. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 13(2), 1141–1156.

Bursal, M. (2017). Academic achievement and perceived peer support among turkish students: Gender and preschool education ımpact. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 9(3), 599-612.

Cresswel, J.W. (2015). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. London: Sage Publication.

Daneshamooz, S., Alamolhodaei, H., & Darvishian, S. (2012). Experimental research about effect of mathematics anxiety, working memory capacity on students’ mathematical performance with three different types of learning methods. ARPN Journal of Science and Technology, 2(4), 313–321. Retrieved from http://www.ejournalofscience.org/Download_May_pdf_2.php.

De Jong. (2010). Cognitive load theory, educational research, and instructional design: Some food for thought. Instructional Science, 38, 105-134.

Duskri, M., Kumaidi, Suryanto. (2014). Pengembangan tes diagnostik kesulitan belajar matematika di SD. Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 18(1), 44-56.

Permendiknas Nomor 22 Tahun 2006. (2006). Depdiknas. Jakarta.

Fennema, E., Carpenter, T. P., Jacobs, V. R., Franke, M. L., & Levi, L. W. (1998). New perspectives on gender differences in mathematics. Educational Researcher, 27, 4-5.

Gagne, R., Wager, W., Golas, K., Keller, J., & Russell, J. (2005). Principles of instructional design. Performance Improvement, 44, 44-46. doi: 10.1002/pfi.4140440211.

Gallagher, A. M., & De Lisi, R. (1994). Gender differences in scholastic aptitude test: Mathematics problem solving among high-ability students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86(2), 204-211.

Harahap, E. A. & Surya, E. (2017). Kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis siswa kelas vii dalam menyelesaikan persamaan linear satu variabel. Edumatica, 7(1), 268-279.

Hattikudur, S., Sidney, P. G., & Alibali, M. W. (2016). Does comparing informal and formal procedures promote mathematics learning? The benefits of bridging depend on attitudes toward mathematics. Journal of Problem Solving, 9, 13-27.

Hines, M. T. (2008). African american children and mathematical problem solving in texas. National Forum Of Applied Educational Research Journal, 21(3), 1-27.

Intaros, P., Inprasitha, M., & Srisawadi, N. (2014). Students’ problem solving strategies in problem solving - mathematics classroom. 5th world conference on educational Sciences. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 4119-4123.

Jamiah, R. (2016). Analisis perbedaan pemecahan masalah matematika antara laki-laki dan perempuan di kelas xi SMA s al manar medan. Medan State University: Medan.

Kaya, D., Izgiol, D., & Kesan, C. (2014). The investigation of elementary mathematics teacher candidates’ problem solving skills according to various variables. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 6(2), 295-314.

Keitel, C. (1998). Social justice and mathematics education gender, class,ethnicity and the politics of schooling. Berlin: Freie Universität Berlin.

Kusumawati, A. (2007). Kepemimpinan dalam perspektif gender: Adakah perbedaan?. Jurnal Administrasi Bisnis, 1.

Lestari, K. E., & Yudhanegara, M. R. (2015). Penelitian pendidikan matemtika. Bandung: PT Refika Aditama.

Lestari, W. (2017). Pengaruh kemampuan awal matematika dan moivasi belajar terhadap hasil belajar matematika, Jurnal Analisa, 3(1), 76-84.

Marks, G. N. (2008). Accounting for the gender gaps in student performance in reading and mathematics: evidence from 31 countries. Oxford Review of Education, 34(1), 89-109

Martin, M. O., Mullis, I. V. S., Foy, P., & Stanco, G. M. (2012). TIMSS 2011 International Results in Science. International Study Center, Boston College, MA, USA

Moleong, L .J. (2013). Metode penelitian kualitatif. Bandung : PT. Remaja Rosdakarya

Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Foy, P., & Arora, A. (2012). TIMSS 2011 international results in mathematics. International Study Center, Boston College, MA, USA

Mullis, I. V . S. & Martin, M. O. (2013). International association for the evaluation of educational achievement timss 2015 assessment frameworks. TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Lynch School of Education, Boston College: United States

National Center for Education Statistics. (1997). The condition of education 1997. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs97/97388.pdf

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, Va: NCTM.

Nazariah, N., & Abidin, Z. (2017). Intuisi siswa SMK dalam memecahkan masalah matematika ditinjau dari kemampuan matematika dan perbedaan gender. Jurnal Didaktik Matematika, 4(1), 35-52.

Nurmaliah, C. (2013). Analisis keterampilan metakognisi siswa SMP Negeri di kota malang berdasarkan kemampuan awal, tingkat kelas, dan jenis kelain. Jurnal Biologi Edukasi, 1(2), 18– 21.

OECD. (2010). PISA 2009 results: Executive summary. OECD Publications

OECD. (2013). PISA 2012 results in focus. OECD Publications

OECD. (2016). PISA 2015 result (volume 1): excellenge and equity in education. Paris: OECD Publications

Orton, A. (1992). Learning Mathematics: Issues, Theory, and Practice. Great Britain: Redwood Boks

Preckel, F., Goetz, T., Pekrun, R., & Kleine, M. (2008). Gender differences in gifted and average-ability students: comparing girls’ and boys’ achievement, self-concept, interest, and motivation in mathematics. SAGE Journals, 52(2), 146–159.

Polya, G. (1973). How to solve ıt. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

Shalihah, S. K. (2015). Pofil pemecahan masalah matematika open ended siswa SMP ditinjau dari perbedaan gender. Surabaya State University: Surabaya.

Santrock, J. W. (2003). Perkembangan remaja. Jakart: Erlangga

Sudijono, A. (2018). Pengantar statistik pendidikan. PT Rajo Grafindo Persada: Jakarta.

Sugiyanti. (2006). Pengaruh pembelajaran menggunakan pendekatan realistic mathematic education pada pokok bahasan bangun ruang sisi lengkung terhadap prestasi belajar matematika ditinjau dari kemampuan awal siswa kelas VIII SMPN2 Grobongan T.A. 2005/2006. Sebelas Maret University: Surakarta.

Sugiyono. (2013). Metode penelitian pendidikan pendekatan kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Suhita, R. (2013). Analisis kesalahan dalam menyelesaikan soal cerita dalam matematika. Jurnal Pendidikan. 1(2), 37-46.

Susento. (2006). Mekanisme ınteraksi antara pengalaman kultural-matematika, proses kognitif, dan topangan dalam reivensi terbimbing. Surabaya State University: Surabaya.

TIMSS. (2015). TIMSS 2015 Results TIMSS 2015 trend in ınternational mathematics and science study. Retrieved from http://puspendik.kemdikbud.go.id/seminar/upload/RahmawatiSeminar%20Hasil%20TIMSS%202015.pdf

Tuohimaa, P. M.F, Aunola, K., & Nurmi, J. E. (2008). The association between mathematical word problems and reading comprehension. Educational Psychology, 28(4), 409-426.

Turmudi. (2008). Pemecahan masalah matematika. Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.

Wardhani, Sri. (2008). Pembelajaran dan penilaian aspek pemahaman konsep, penalaran dan komunikasi, pemecahan masalah. Yogyakarta: Pusat Pengembangan dan Pemberdayaan Pendidik dan Tenaga Kependidikan Matematika.

Yıldırım, H. H., Yıldırım, S., Yetişir, M. İ., & Ceylan, E. (2013). PISA 2012 national pre-report. Republic of Turkey Ministry of National Education, Ankara.

Yoenanto, N. H. (2002). Hubungan kemampuan memecahkan soal cerita matematika dengan tingkat kreativitas siswa sekolah menengah umum. Jurnal Psikologi Pendidikan: Insan. 4(2), 63-72.

Zubaidah. A. (2013). Perspektif gender dalam pembelajaran matematika. Jurnal Perempuan, Agama dan Jender, 12(1), 15-31.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

 ISSN: 1305-3515