What Benefits that Students Can Take? Portraying the Implementation of EFL Curriculum in Indonesia through Phenomenological Lens

Urip Sulistiyo, Mariza Juwita, Kaspul Anwar, Hadiyanto Hadiyanto, Mujiono Wiryotinoyo, Prastiwi Sri Agustina, Syofranita Astini

Abstract


In response to the latest curriculum implementation in Indonesia, this research examines the implementation of 2013 curriculum through a phenomenological lens. It draws the data from interviews with two experienced English teachers teaching in two pioneer schools that have implemented 2013 curriculum since 2014 in Jambi city, Sumatera, Indonesia. The finding of this research shows that there are two major benefits that students can take from the implementation of English as a Foreign Language Curriculum (EFL) 2013 curriculum. First, it is promoting for independent learning. Through the implementation of 2013 curriculum, students become active constructors for new knowledge in which the learning activities are planned and facilitated by the teachers. Second, the implementation of 2013 curriculum stimulates students to be creative learners. Students may be able to do their works or projects better than it is expected by the teachers. The finding suggests that teachers need to improve their ability to design classroom activity that allow students to be active and creative learners. Teachers need to be able to create good atmosphere and think a step ahead from the students in order to make a good classroom engagement and to trigger students’ independent learning and creativity for the lesson facilitated by the teachers.

 


Keywords


Active learners, creative learners, language integrated skills, phenomenological lens

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ahmad, D. (2014). Understanding the 2013 curriculum of english teaching through the teachers' and policymakers' perspectives. International Journal of Enhanced Research in Educational Development (IJERED), 2(4), 6-15.

Bentri, A., Hidayati, A., & Rahmi, U. (2015). The Problem Analysis in Applying Instrument of Authentic Assessment in 2013 Curriculum. International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR), 5(10), 2319-7064.

Beghetto A. Ronald & Kaufman C. James (2014) Classroom contexts for creativity, High Ability Studies, 25:1, 53-69, DOI: 10.1080/13598139.2014.905247

Broad, J. (2006). Interpretations of independent learning in further education. Journal of Further and Higher Education. 30( 2) 119–143.

Creswell, J. W. (2009). Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (3rd ed.). Los Angeles: Sage Publications. Inc.

Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Fourth edition. Boston: Pearson Education, Inc.

Dardjowidjojo, S. (2000). English teaching in Indonesia. English Australia Journal, 18(1), 22-30.

Djibiti, A. (2008). A Study of the Practice of Integrating Language Skills in the Teaching of English: Three Government Primary and Secondary Schools in Focus. (Graduate Programme), Addis Ababa University.

Ellis, R. (2009). Task-Based Language Teaching: Sorting Out the Misunderstanding. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 19(3), 221-246.

Englander, M. (2012). The interview: Data collection in descriptive phenomenological human scientific research. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology, 43, 13–35.

Estuarso, D. (2015). Issues in English Instruction. Malang: Graduate Program in English Language Teaching, Malang University.

Hariana, R. (2015). Implementasi program Kurikulum 2013 di SMP Negeri 7 Samarinda. eJournal Administrasi Negara, 3(5).

Hatch, J. A. (2002). Doing qualitative esearch in education settings. United States of America: State University of New York Press.

Hong, E., Hartzell S. A., Greene M. T. (2009). Fostering creativity in the classroom: Effects of teachers’ epistemological beliefs, motivation, and goal orientation. Journal of Creative Behavior, 43, 192–208.

Jackson, M. & Shenton, A. K. (2010). Independent learning areas and student learning. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science. 42(4) 215–223.

Jazadi, I. (2000). Constraints and resources for applying communicative approaches in Indonesia. English Australia Journal, 18(1), 31-40.

Jeffrey, B. & Craft A. (2004): Teaching creatively and teaching for creativity: distinctions and relationships, Educational Studies, 30:1, 77-87

Kaufman, D. (2004). Constructivist issues in language learning and teaching. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 24, 303-319.

Kopzhassarova, U., Akbayeva, G., Eskazinova, Zhanar, Belgibayeva, G., & Tazhikeyeva, A. (2016). Enhancement of Students’ Independent Learning Through Their Critical Thinking Skills Development. International Journal Of Environmental & Science Education, 11(18), 11585-11585

Kusumastuti, A., Sudiyanto, & Octoria, D. (2016). Faktor-faktor penghambat guru dalam melaksanakan Kurikulum 2013 pada pembelajaran akuntansi di SMK Negeri 3 Surakarta. Jurnal “Tata Arta”, 2(1), 118-133.

MoNE. (2013). Peraturan menteri pendidikan dan kebudayaan republik Indonesia nomor 65/2013 tentang standar proses pendidikan dasar dan menengah [The decree of Minister of education and culture of republic of Indonesia No 65/2013 about standard of process in elementary and high school levels]. Jakarta, Indonesia: Balai Pustaka.

Mutlu Cukurova & Judith Bennett. (2017). Students’ knowledge acquisition and ability to apply knowledge into different science contexts in two different independent learning settings, Research in Science & Technological Education, DOI: 10.1080/02635143.2017.1336709

NACCCE (1999) All our futures: creativity, culture and education (London, DfEE).

Nur, M. R., & Madkur, A. (2014). Teachers’ Voices On The 2013 Curriculum for English Instructional Activities. IJEE, 1(2), 199-134.

Orhan, I., & Bülent, A. (2015). A Qualitative Research on 2nd Grade Teachers’ Opinions about 2nd Grade English Language Teaching Curriculum. Elementary Education Online, 14(2), 682-696.

Oxford. (2001). Integrated Skills in the ESL/EFL Classroom. In E. Digest (Ed.), (pp. 1-7).

Putra, K. A. (2014). The implication of curriculum renewal on elt in indonesiaon. Parole, 4(1), 63-75.

Rukmini, D., & Saputri, L. A. D. E. (2017). The Authentic Assessment to Measure Students’ English Productive Skills Based on 2013 Curriculum. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 7(2), 263-273.

Rumahlatu, D., Huliselan, E. K., & Takaria, J. (2016). An analysis of the readiness and implementation of 2013 curriculum in the west part of seram district, Maluku province, Indonesia. International journal of environmental & science education, 11(12), 5662-5675.

Sarosa, T. (2014). Implementing Curriculum 2013 by Using Communicative Language Teaching. UAD TEFL, 1117-1122.

Shafa. (2014). Karakteristik Proses Pembelajaran Kurikulum 2013. Dinamika Ilmu, 4(1), 81-96.

Sternberg, R. J., Grigorenko, E. L., & Singer, J. L. (Eds.). (2004). Creativity: From potential to realization. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Su, Y. C. (2007). Students’ Changing Views and the Integrated-Skills Approach in Taiwan’s EFL College Classes. 8(1), 27-40.

Sulfasyah. (2013). Investigating the implementation of the Indonesian KTSP (school-based curriculum) in the teaching of writing in year two. (Doctor of Philosophys), Edith Cowan University, Perth.

Sundayana, W. (2015). Readiness and competence of senior high school English teachers to Implement Curriculum 2013. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 5(1), 29-36.

Tantra, D. K. (2014). Teaching english as a foreign language in indonesia: A literature review. Teaching english as a foreign language in indonesia, 1-5

Tajzad, M., & Namaghi, S. (2014). Exploring EFL Learners’ Perceptions of Integrated Skills Approach: A Grounded Theory. English Language Teaching, 7(11), 92-98.

Wahyudin, A. (2015). The Implementation of Scientific Method in Teaching English as a Foreign Language at Senior High School Level. (Master ), Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung.

Zaim, M. (2016). Implementing Scientific Approach to Teach English at Senior High School in Indonesia. Asian Social Science, 13(2), 33-40.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

 ISSN: 1305-3515