Teaching Socio-scientific Issues Through Evidence-based Thinking Practices: Appropriateness, Benefits and Challenges of Using an Instructional Scaffold

Gaye Defne Ceyhan, Ebru Z. Mugaloglu, John W. Tillotson

Abstract


Teachers are expected to improve their students’ analytical thinking and decision-making skills through evidence-based thinking and critical evaluation processes. In this study, a three-hour workshop was conducted to investigate science teachers’ views about teaching socio-scientific issues through argumentation and introducing an instructional scaffold, Model-Evidence Link diagrams to promote the use of argumentation and critical evaluation in science classrooms. 125 science teachers, who were working in public schools of an urban area in Turkey participated in the workshop. Findings revealed that 90% of the participants stated that the use of MEL diagram is appropriate for science teaching. Promoting higher order thinking skills was the highest benefit, whereas the need for time for the development and implementation of the material was the greatest challenge for the use of the MEL diagrams in science classrooms. This study contributes to the literature on teaching socio-scientific issues, especially through argumentation, evidence-based thinking, and critical evaluation.

Keywords


Evidence-based thinking, argumentation, socio-scientific issues, climate change

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bofferding, L. & Kloser, M. (2014). Middle and high school students’ conceptions of climate change mitigation and adaptation strategies. Environmental Education Research, 21(2), 275-294. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2014.888401

Chinn, C. A., & Buckland, L. A. (2012). Model-based instruction: Fostering change in evolutionary conceptions and in epistemic practices. In K. S. Rosengren, E. M. Evans, S. Brem, & G. M. Sinatra (Eds.), Evolution challenges: Integrating research and practice in teaching and learning about evolution (pp. 211-232). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Erduran, S., Ardac, D., & Yakmaci-Guzel, B. (2006). Learning to teach argumentation: Case studies of preservice secondary science teachers. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 2(2), 1–14.

IPCC, (2013). Summary for Policymakers. In: Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (Stocker, T.F., D. Qin, G.-K. Plattner, M. Tignor, S.K. Allen, J. Boschung, A. Nauels, Y. Xia, V. Bex and P.M. Midgley (eds.)). United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Kara, Y. (2012). Pre-service biology teachers’ perceptions on the instruction of socio-scientific issues in the curriculum. European Journal of Teacher Education, 35(1), 111-129. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2011.633999

Kilinc, A., Stanisstreet, M., & Boyes, E. (2008). Turkish students’ ideas about global warming. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 3 (2), 89-98.

Kuhn, D. (1999). A developmental model of critical thinking. Educational Researcher, 28(2), 16-46.

Lombardi, D., Sinatra, G.M., & Nussbaum, E.M. (2013). Plausibility reappraisals and shifts in middle school students’ climate change conceptions. Learning and Instruction, 27, 50-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.03.001

Lombardi, D., Seyranian, V., & Sinatra, G.M. (2014). Source effects and plausibility judgments when reading about climate change. Discourse Processes, 51(1-2), 75-92. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2013.855049

MONE, Ministry of National Education, (2013). Fen Bilimleri Dersi Ogretim Programı (3, 4, 5, 6, 7, ve 8.siniflar). Talim ve Terbiye Kurulu Baskanligi, Ankara. [in Turkish]

Mugaloglu, E. Z., Can, N. & Ceyhan, G. (2017) Kanıta dayalı fen eğitimi: Model kanıt ilişki şeması [Evidence based science education: Model-evidence link diagram]. Mutlu Pınar Demirci Güler (ed.) Fen Bilimleri Öğretimi: Kuram ve Uygulama Örnekleri. Pegem

Nussbaum, E. M. (2011). Argumentation, dialogue theory, and probability modeling: alternative frameworks for argumentation research in education. Educational Psychologist, 46, 84e106. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2011.558816

Osborne, J., Erduran, S., & Simon, S. (2004). Enhancing the quality of argumentation in school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(10), 994-1020. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20035

Öztürk, M. (2019). An Evaluation of an Innovative In-Service Teacher Training Model in Turkey. International Journal of Higher Education, 8(1), 23-36. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v8n1p23

Papadimitriou, V. (2004). Prospective primary teachers’ understanding of climate change, greenhouse effect, and ozone layer depletion. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 13 (2), 299-307. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOST.0000031268.72848.6d

Pruneau, D., Gravel, H., Courque, W., & Langis, J. (2003). Experimentation with a socio-constructivist process for climate change education. Environmental Education Research, 9(4), 429–446. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350462032000126096

Saribas D., Ceyhan G.D. (2015). Learning to teach scientific practices: Pedagogical decisions and reflections during a course for pre-service science teachers. International Journal of STEM Education, 2(7). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-015-0023-y

Saribas, D., Ceyhan, G. D., & Lombardi, D. (2019). Zooming in on scientific practices and evidence-based explanations during teaching NOS: A study in pre-service teacher education program. Ilköğretim Online, 18(1). doi: 10.17051/ilkonline.2019.527626

Simon, S., Erduran, S., & Osborne, J. (2006). Learning to teach argumentation: Research and development in the science classroom. International Journal of Science Education, 28(2-3), 235-260. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690500336957


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

 

 

 

Creative Commons License
Elementary Education Online is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

ISSN: 1305-3515