The effectiveness of the integration of open-ended and collaborative (OE-C) learning strategies in reducing gaps of elementary school students’ creative thinking skills

Eni Titikusumawati, Cholis Sadijah, Abdur Rahman As'ari, Hery Susanto

Abstract


This study examines a blend of open-ended and collaborative learning strategies (OE-C) in comparison to other strategies in minimizing the gap of creative thinking skills between Upper Academic (UA) and Lower Academic (LA) students. The population of this study was 136 fifth grade students of an elementary school in Salatiga, Indonesia. The sample consisted of each 68 UA and 68 LA students categorized by intact group technique sampling. Research method employed was the 4x2 factorial design. The students’ creative thinking skills were measured with open-ended validated problem testing, focusing on students’ fluency, flexibility, originality, and elaboration. Data were analysed using ANCOVA with the pre-test score as the covariate. Findings suggest that OE-C learning strategy is the most effective learning method to elevate students’ creative thinking skills. Further, the OE-C learning strategy also serves as the most efficient to reduce gaps of creative thinking skills.

Keywords


Creative thinking; Open-ended; Collaborative; Lecture method

Full Text:

PDF

References


Acar, F., & Ader, E. (2107). Metacognition used by tutors during peer tutoring sessions in Mathematics. Elementary Education Online, 16(3), 1185-1200. https:// doi.org/10.17051/ilkonline.2017.330250

Azizah, N. R., Masykuri, M., & Prayitno, B. A. (2018). Scaffolding as an effort for thinking process optimization on heredity. Journal of Physics: Conf. Series, 1006(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1006/1/012017

Bacanli, H., Dombayci, M. A., Demir, M., & Tarhan, S. (2011). Quadruple thinking: creative thinking. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 12(2011), 536–544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.02.065

Chan, S. C. H., Wan, J. C. L., & Ko, S. (2019). Interactivity, active collaborative learning, and learning performance: The moderating role of perceived fun by using personal response systems. International Journal of Management Education, 17(1), 94–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2018.12.004

Duane, B. T., & Satre, M. E. (2014). Utilizing constructivism learning theory in collaborative testing as a creative strategy to promote essential nursing skills. Nurse Education Today, 34(1), 31–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2013.03.005

Harvey, S., & Uren, C. D. (2018). Collaborative learning: Application of the mentorship model for adult nursing students in the acute placement setting. Nurse Education Today, 74(2), 38–40. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2018.11.022

Husain, H., Bais, B., Hussain, A., & Abdul, S. (2012). How to construct open ended questions. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 60(2012), 456-462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.406

Kashani, L., Afrooz, G. A., Shokoohi, M., Kharrazi, K., & Ghobari, B. (2017). Can a creative interpersonal problem solving program improve creative thinking in gifted elementary students? Thinking Skills and Creativity, 24(1), 175–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2017.02.011

Kincal, R. Y., Avcu, Y. E., & Kartal, O. Y. (2016). The effects of creative thinking activities on learners’ creative thinking skills and academic achievement. Journal of Theoretical Educational Science, 9(1), 15–37. https://doi.org/10.5578/keg.9722

Kurniati, D., Purwanto., Asa,ri, A., & , Dwiyana. (2019). The Truth-Seeking and Open-Mindedness of Pre-Service Mathematics Teachers in the Solution of Non-Routine Problem. International Journal of Instruction. 12(1), 915-930. https://doi.org/pad 10.29333/iji.2019.12159a.

Laal, M., & Laal, M. (2012). Collaborative learning: What is it? Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 31(2011), 491–495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.12.092

Florida, R., Mellander, C., & King, K. (2005). The global creativity index 2015. Martin Prosperity Institute: Toronto Canada

Murphy, C., Bianchi, L., McCullagh, J., & Kerr, K. (2013). Scaling up higher order thinking skills and personal capabilities in primary science: Theory-into-policy-into-practice. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 10(1), 173–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2013.06.005

Ozden, M. (2008). Improving science and technology education achievement using mastery learning model. World Applied Sciences Journal, 5(1), 62–67. http://idosi.org/wasj/wasj5(1)/10.pdf

Piawa, C. Y. (2010). Building a test to assess creative and critical thinking simultaneously. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 551–559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.062

Prayitno, B. A., Corebima, D., Susilo, H., & Ramli, M. (2017). Closıng the scıence process skılls gap between students wıth hıgh and low level. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 16(2), 266–277. http://www.scientiasocialis.lt/jbse/files/pdf/vol16/266-277.Prayitno_JBSE_Vol.16_No.2.pdf

Prayitno, B. A., & Suciati. (2017). Narrowing the gap of science students’ learning outcomes through INSTAD strategy. New Educational Review, 50(4). 123-133. https://doi.org/10.15804/tner.2017.50.4.10

Prayitno, B. A., Suciati, & Titikusumawati, E. (2018). Enhancing students’ higher order thinking skills in science through INSTAD strategy. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 17(2018), 1046–1055. http://oaji.net/articles/2017/987-1544860627.pdf

Ramaraj, A., & Nagammal, J. (2016). Investigating the creative processes and outcomes of an open ended design task: A qualitative study on two days practicum for architecture students. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 21(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2015.11.005

Sa'dijah, C., Nurrahmawati., Sudirman., Muksar, M & Anwar, L. (2018). Teachers' Representation in Solving Mathematical Word Problem. Conference: the 2nd International Conference, 1 (1). 85-89. https://doi.org/10.1145/3206129.3239419.

Santi, D. H., Prayitno, B. A., & Muzzazinah. (2018). Exploring ecosystem problems: A way to analyze a profile of creative thinking skills in upper and lower academic students in senior high school in Klaten Regency. AIP Conference Proceedings, 020117(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5054521

Siew, N. M., Chong, C. L., & Lee, B. N. (2015). Fostering fifth graders’ scientific creativity through problem-based learning. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 14(5), 655–669. http://journals.indexcopernicus.com/abstract.php?icid=1180097

Sitorus, J., & Masrayati. (2016). Students’ creative thinking process stages: Implementation of realistic mathematics education. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 22(1), 111–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2016.09.007

Surif, J., Ibrahim, H., & Dalim, F. (2014). Problem Solving : Algorithms and conceptual and open-ended problems in chemistry. In Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 116(2014), 4855-4963. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.1055

Tan, N., Najiha, S., & Abd, N. (2012). Nurturing innovative and creativity through open ended laboratory : JKKP Experience, 56(1), 713–717. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.707

Yusnaeni, Corebima, A. D., Susilo, H., & Zubaidah, S. (2017). Creative thinking of low academic student undergoing search solve create and share learning. International Journal of Instruction, 10(2), 245–262. http://www.e-iji.net/dosyalar/iji_2017_2_16.pdf


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

 ISSN: 1305-3515