The effect of different self-assessment tools on students’ attitudes towards learning English

Burcu Şentürk, İsmail Hakkı Mirici

Abstract


The study investigated the effect of self-assessment via the European Language Portfolio (ELP), a unit based checklist and a learner style inventory on students’ attitudes towards learning English. The data were collected via an attitude scale adopted from Dörnyei and Csizér (2006) and from Ryan (2005). The results of the study indicated that the ELP, learner style inventory and unit based checklists were the tools which have potential to promote self-assessment on the condition that they are used effectively both by EFL teachers and their students, and as a consequence they may support developing positive attitudes towards learning English.  Additionally, it was found. In addition, both the teachers and the students believed that the ELP was a tool for self-assessment; however, the implementation that the students felt positive towards the use of the ELP and working with it as far as they used it correctly as part of their curriculum of the ELP in the school curriculum needs support since they do not have enough information about the use and the effectiveness of the ELP.


Keywords


Self-assessment; ELP; Unit based checklist; Learner style

Full Text:

PDF

References


Brown, H. D. (2000). Principles of language learning and teaching. 4th ed. White Plains, NY: Addison Wesley Longman.

Carreira, J. M. (2005). New Framework of Intrinsic/Extrinsic & Integrative/Instrumental Motivation in Second Language Acquisition. The Keiai Journal of International Studies, 76, 39-64.

Ceylan, M. (2006). European language portfolio as a self-directed learning tool. (Unpublished Master’s Thesis) Bilkent University, Ankara.

Cheng, H, F. & Dörnyei, Z. (2007). The use of motivational strategies in language instruction: The case of EFL teaching in Taiwan. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 1,153-174.

Csızér, K. & Dörnyei, Z. (2005). The internal structure of language learning motivation and its relationship with language choice and learning effort. The Modern Language Journal, (89), 19-36.

Council of Europe, (1992). Transparency and coherence in language learning in Europe: Objecives, evaluation, certification. Report on the Rüschlikon Symposium. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.

Council of Europe (2000). European language portfolio (ELP): Principles and guidelines, Document DGIV/EDU/LANG, (2000) 33. Strasbourg, Council of Europe.

Council of Europe (2001). Common European Framework of References for Languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Dörnyei, Z. and K. Csizér. (2002). Some dynamics of language attitudes and motivation: Results of a longitudinal nationwide survey. Applied Linguistics 23 (4), 421–62.

Ehrman, M. & Oxford, R. (1990). Adult language learning styles and strategies in an intensive training setting. Modern Language Journal, 74, 311-326.

Gardner, R. C. & Lambert, W. E. (1972).Attitudes and motivation in second language learning. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.

Glover, P., Mirici, İ. H., & Aksu, M. B. (2005). Preparing for the European Language Portfolio: Internet connections. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education- TOJDE, 6(1), [Online: http://tojde.anadolu.edu.tr/yonetim/icerik/ makaleler/179-published.pdf Retrieved on 02 January 2016]

Holec, H. (1981). Autonomy and foreign language learning. Oxford: Pergamon. (First published 1979, Strasbourg: Council of Europe)

Koyuncu, S. (2006). The effect of the European language portfolio on learner autonomy for young learners. (Unpublished Master’s Thesis) Çukurova University, Turkey.

Little, D. (1991). Learner autonomy 1: Definitions, issues and problems. Dublin: Authentik.

Mirici, I. H. (2000). European Language Portfolio: A tool for a common language education policy in Europe. Journal of Interdisciplinary Education, 6(1), 161-166.

Mirici, İ. H. (2006). Electronic In-Service Teacher-Training for the New National EFL Curriculum in Turkey. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 7(1), 155-164. [Online: http://tojde.anadolu.edu.tr/yonetim/icerik/makaleler/244-published.pdf Retrieved on 03 January 2016]

Mirici, İ. H. (2008). Development and validation process of a European language portfolio model for young learners. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 9(2), 26-34. [Online: http://tojde.anadolu.edu.tr/yonetim/icerik/makaleler/399-published.pdf Retrieved on 03 January 2016]

Skehan, P. (1989). Individual Differences in Second Language Learning. London: Edward Arnold.

Skehan, P. (1991). Individual differences in second language learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 13, 275-298.

Tokoz Göztepe, F. (2014). Attitudes and Motivation of Turkish Undergraduate EFL Students towards Learning English Language. Studies in English Language Teaching. 2 (3), 314-332.

Yang, Nae D. (2003). Integrating Portfolios into Learning Strategy-Based Instruction for EFL College Students, International Review of Applied Linguistics

Yang, J. S. R. (2008). Motivational orientation and selected learner variables in East Asian Language Learners in the United States. Foreign Language Annals, 36(1), 44-56.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

 ISSN: 1305-3515