Developing a five-tier diagnostic test to identify students’ misconceptions in science

Rif'at Shafwatul Anam

Öz


To diagnose students’ misconceptions, researchers commonly use several diagnostic tools that can best describe students’ conceptions. The purpose of this article is to propose a new diagnostic test that can be used to diagnose students’ understanding of a concept and what they think about the concept. The instrument uses the multiple-tier test (four-tier) and adds one more tier, a drawing tier. So, this new instrument is called a five-tier test. This instrument can diagnose students’ conceptions in more details and can be the window to student thinking that can help teachers in diagnostic, formative, and summative assessment. The research involved 69 elementary school (fifth grade) students as participants. The research result shows that almost all students only knew concepts at the macroscopic level; they had a lack of knowledge at the microscopic level, both on verbal and visual (drawing) tests. Overall, this article is expected to contribute a new diagnostic test that can provide complete data about students’ conceptions

Anahtar Kelimeler


Diagnostic instruments, multiple-tier test, drawing, misconceptions

Tam Metin:

PDF (English)

Referanslar


Ainsworth, S., Prain, V., & Tytler, R. (2011). Science education. Drawing to learn in science. Science, 333(6046), 1096-1097. doi: 10.1126/science.1204153

Anam, R. S., Widodo, A., & Sopandi, W. (2017). Representation of Elementary School Teachers on Concept of Heat Transfer. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 895(2017), 012159. doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/895/1/012159

Anderson, J. L., Ellis, J. P., & Jones, A. M. (2014). Understanding early elementary children's conceptual knowledge of plant structure and function through drawings. CBE Life Sci Educ, 13(3), 375-386. doi: 10.1187/cbe.13-12-0230

Bahar, M., Ozel, M., Prokop, P., & Usak, M. (2008). Science student teachers' ideas of the heart. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 7(2), 78 - 85.

Caleon, I., & Subramaniam, R. (2010). Development and Application of a Three‐Tier Diagnostic Test to Assess Secondary Students’ Understanding of Waves. International Journal of Science Education, 32(7), 939-961. doi: 10.1080/09500690902890130

Chandrasegaran, A. L. T., D. F.; Mocerino, M. . (2007). The Development of a Two-Tier Multiple-Choice Diagnostic Instrument for Evaluating Secondary School Students’ Ability to Describe and Explain Chemical Reactions Using Multiple Levels of Representation. Chemistry Education Research Practice, 8(3), 293 - 307.

Chang, H. P., Chen, J. Y., Guo, C. J., Chen, C. C., Chang, C. Y., Lin, S. H., . . . Tseng, Y. T. (2007). Investigating Primary and Secondary Students’ Learning of Physics Concepts in Taiwan. International Journal of Science Education, 29(4), 465-482. doi: 10.1080/09500690601073210

Cherney, I. D., Seiwert, C. S., Dickey, T. M., & Flichtbeil, J. D. (2006). Children’s Drawings: A mirror to their minds. Educational Psychology, 26(1), 127-142. doi: 10.1080/01443410500344167

Çoruhlu, T. S. (2017). Pre-service science teachers' conceptions of the "conduction of heat in solids". Journal of Baltic Science Education, 16(22), 163 - 174.

Dikmenli, M. (2010). Misconceptions of cell division held by student teachers in biology: A drawing analysis. Scientific Research and Essay, 5(2), 235 - 247.

Dove, J. E., Everett, L. A., & Preece, P. F. W. (1999). Exploring a hydrological concept through children's drawings. International Journal of Science Education, 21(5), 485 - 497.

Downing, S. M. (2006). Twelve steps for effective test development. In S. M. Downing & T. M. Haladayna (Eds.), Handbook of test development (pp. 3 - 25). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

Ehrlén, K. (2009). Drawings as Representations of Children's Conceptions. International Journal of Science Education, 31(1), 41-57. doi: 10.1080/09500690701630455

Einarsdottir, J., Dockett, S., & Perry, B. (2009). Making meaning: children’s perspectives expressed through drawings. Early Child Development and Care, 179(2), 217-232. doi: 10.1080/03004430802666999

Glynn, S., & Muth, K. D. (2008). Using drawing strategically: drawing activities make life science meaningful to third- and fourth-grade students. Science and Children, 45, 48 - 51.

Gooding, D. C. (2004). Cognition, Construction and Culture: Visual Theories in the Sciences. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 4(551), 551-593. doi: 10.1163/1568537042484896

Guida, A., & Lavielle-Guida, M. (2014). 2011 space odyssey: spatialization as a mechanism to code order allows a close encounter between memory expertise and classic immediate memory studies. Front Psychol, 5, 573. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00573

Haney, W., Russell, M., & Bebell, D. (2004). Drawing on education: using drawings to document schooling and support change. Harvard Educational Review, 74(3), 241 - 271. doi: 10.17763/haer.74.3.w0817u84w7452011

Hasan, S., Bagayoko, D., & Kelley, E. L. (1999). Misconceptions and the Certainty of Response Index (CRI). Physics Education, 34(5), 294-299. doi: 10.1088/0031-9120/34/5/304

Johnstone, A. H. (1991). Why is science difficult to learn? Things are seldom what they seem. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 7, 75 - 83. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.1991.tb00230.x

Kaltakci-Gurel, D., Eryilmaz, A., & McDermott, L. C. (2015). A Review and Comparison of Diagnostic Instruments to Identify Students’ Misconceptions in Science. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 11(5), 989 - 1008. doi: 10.12973/eurasia.2015.1369a

Kaltakci-Gurel, D., Eryilmaz, A., & McDermott, L. C. (2017). Development and application of a four-tier test to assess pre-service physics teachers’ misconceptions about geometrical optics. Research in Science & Technological Education, 35(2), 238-260. doi: 10.1080/02635143.2017.1310094

Kaltakci, D. (2012). Development and Application of a four-tier test to assess pre-service physics teachers’ misconceptions about geometrical optics. (Ph. D.), Middle East Technical University.

Kirschner, P. A., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2013). Do Learners Really Know Best? Urban Legends in Education. Educational Psychologist, 48(3), 169-183. doi: 10.1080/00461520.2013.804395

Köse, S. (2008). Diagnosing Student Misconceptions: Using Drawings as a Research Method. World Applied Science Journal, 3(2), 283 - 293.

McDermott, L. C. (1991). Millikan Lecture 1990: What we teach and what is learned—Closing the gap. American Journal of Physics, 59(4), 301-315. doi: 10.1119/1.16539

Milenković, D. D., Hrin, T. N., Segedinac, M. D., & Horvat, S. (2016). Development of a Three-Tier Test as a Valid Diagnostic Tool for Identification of Misconceptions Related to Carbohydrates. Journal of Chemical Education, 93(9), 1514-1520. doi: 10.1021/acs.jchemed.6b00261

Nakhleh, M. B., & Krajcik, J. S. (1994). Influence of levels of information as presented by different technologies on students' understanding of acid, base, and ph concepts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(10), 1077-1096. doi: 10.1002/tea.3660311004

Peşman, H., & Eryılmaz, A. (2010). Development of a Three-Tier Test to Assess Misconceptions About Simple Electric Circuits. The Journal of Educational Research, 103(3), 208-222. doi: 10.1080/00220670903383002

Pridmore, P., & Bendelow, G. (1995). Image of health: exploring beliefs of children using the 'draw-and-write' tecnique. Health Education Journal, 54, 473 - 488. doi: 10.1177/001789699505400410

Prokop, P., & Fancovicová, J. (2006). Students’ ideas about the human body: Do they really draw what they know? Journal of Baltic Science Education, 2(10), 86 - 95.

Prokop, P., Prokop, M., Tunnicliffe, S. D., & Diran, C. (2007). Children's ideas of animals' internal structures. Journal of Biological Education, 41(2), 62-67. doi: 10.1080/00219266.2007.9656064

Quillin, K., & Thomas, S. (2015). Drawing-to-learn: a framework for using drawings to promote model-based reasoning in biology. CBE Life Sci Educ, 14(1), es2. doi: 10.1187/cbe.14-08-0128

Reiss, M. J., Tunnicliffe, S. D., Andersen, M., Bartoszeck, A., Carvalho, G. S., Chen, S.-Y., . . . Roy, W. M. (2002). An international study of young peoples' drawing of what is inside themselves. Journal of Biological Education, 36, 58 - 64.

Schmidt, H. J. (1997). Students’ Misconceptions-Looking for a Pattern. Science Education, 81(2), 214 - 225.

Schwartz, D. L. (1995). The Emergence of Abstract Representations in Dyad Problem Solving. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4(3), 321-354. doi: 10.1207/s15327809jls0403_3

Schwarz, C. V., Reiser, B. J., Davis, E. A., Kenyon, L., Achér, A., Fortus, D., . . . Krajcik, J. (2009). Developing a learning progression for scientific modeling: Making scientific modeling accessible and meaningful for learners. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(6), 632-654. doi: 10.1002/tea.20311

Sia, D. T., Treagust, D. F., & Chandrasegaran, A. L. (2012). High School Students’ Proficiency and Confidence Levels in Displaying Their Understanding of Basic Electrolysis Concepts. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 10(6), 1325-1345. doi: 10.1007/s10763-012-9338-z

Sopandi, W., Kadarohman, A., Rosbiono, M., Latip, A., & Sukardi, R. R. (2018). The Courseware of Discontinuous Nature of Matter in Teaching the States of Matter and Their Changes. International Journal of Instruction, 11(1), 61-76. doi: 10.12973/iji.2018.1115a

Sopandi, W., Latip, A., & Sujana, A. (2017). Prospective Primary School Teachers’ Understanding on States Of Matter and Their Changes. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 812(012075), 012075. doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/812/1/012075

Sreenivasulu, B., & Subramaniam, R. (2013). University Students’ Understanding of Chemical Thermodynamics. International Journal of Science Education, 35(4), 601-635. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2012.683460

Tsai, C.-C., & Chou, C. (2002). Diagnosing students’ alternative conceptions in science. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 18, 157-165. doi: 10.1046/j.0266-4909.2002.00223.x

Yang, D.-C., & Lin, Y.-C. (2015). Assessing 10- to 11-year-old children’s performance and misconceptions in number sense using a four-tier diagnostic test. Educational Research, 57(4), 368-388. doi: 10.1080/00131881.2015.1085235


Refback'ler

  • Şu halde refbacks yoktur.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

 

 

 

Creative Commons Lisansı

İlköğretim Online Dergisi Creative Commons Alıntı-Gayriticari 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı ile lisanslanmıştır.

ISSN: 1305-3515