Exploring Elementary Students' Invention Ingenuity in Science Labs

Mustafa Jwaifell, Osama M Kraishan


Invention is one of the strongest forces that lead to human civilization. Without a clear picture and scientific understanding of invention, it can hardly be any continuity of the past, present, or future (Schlesinger, 1973). This study carried out in Ma'an, a poor-environment area of Southern Governorate in Jordan, with 50 ninth-grade students: 25 males and 25 females aged 15 years old, has one aim which is to explore ninth-grade students' invention ingenuity in science labs. Fifty ninth-grade students from two schools of Ma'an directorates of education were chosen randomly to participate in solving five problems and invent products to solve those problems in science labs. A mix of qualitative and quantitative methodology was used to answer the study questions. Results of the study showed significant invention products according to the problems the students faced, teachers appreciated the Invention in Science Labs framework as an instructional model, and students valued this kind of learning experience. Recommendations were included in this study.

Full Text:



Aflalo, E. (2018). Changing in perceptions of the nature of science and religious belief. Issues in Educational Research, 28 (2), 237-253.

Bachtiar, S., Zubaidah, S., Corebima, A. D. & Indriwati, S. E. (2017). The spiritual and social attitudes of students towards integrated problem based learning models. Issues in Educational Research, 28(2), 254-270. http://www.iier.org.au/iier28/bachtiar.pdf

Besemer, S. P., & O’Quin, K. (1999). Confirming the three factor creative product analyses matrix model in an American sample. Creativity Research Journal, 12, 287–296.

Bostrom, R. P. & Nagasasundarman, M. (1998). Research in creativity and GSS. Proceedings of the thirty-First Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Retrieved April 28, 2017, from:

https://www.computer.org/csdl/proceedings/hicss/1998/8248/06/82480391.pdf .

Colangelo, N., Assouline, S. G., Croft, L., Baldus, C. M., & Ihrig, D. (2003). Young inventors. In Shavinina, L. V. (Ed.) International handbook on innovation (pp. 281-292). The Netherlands: Elsevier Science Ltd.

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage

Daly, S. R., et al. (2016). College students’ views of creative process instruction across disciplines. Journal Thinking Skills and Creativity, 22 1–13

DuBois. A, & Keller. T. (2016). Curriculum Weaving: Developing Creative Curricular Opportunities for Pre-Service Teachers and Elementary Students through Project-Based Learning. Journal of Curriculum and Teaching, 5, 2, 37-42.

Davies, D., Jindal-Snape, D., Collier, C., Digby, R., Hay, P., & Howe, A. (2013). Creative Learning Environments in Education: A Systematic Literature Review. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 8, 80-91.

Fagerberg, J., Mowery, D., and Nelson, R. (eds). The Oxford Handbook of Innovation, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2004, P. 514-544.

Fleith, D. S., Renzulli, J. S., & Westberg, K. L. (2002). Effects of a Creativity Training Program on Divergent. Thinking Abilities and Self-Concept in Monolingual and Bilingual Classrooms.Creativity Research Journal, 14, Nos. 3 & 4, 373–386.

Goodnough, K and Murphy, E. (2017). An analysis of the professional learning of science teachers using the metaphore of learning by expanding. Issues in Educational Research, 27 (1), 64-81.

Invent Iowa. K-12 Instructional Guide, State Invent Iowa Competition. Retrieved January 22, 2017, from: https://www2.education.uiowa.edu/belinblank/students/inventiowa/K-8_Guide/Convention.aspx

Kuehn, C., & Krockover, G., (1986). An analysis of fifh and sixth grade students' acquisition of the inventing process. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 276618.

Lee, K.T., Chalmers, C., Vinesh, C., Yeh, A. & Nason, R. (2014). Retooling Chinese primary school teachers to use technology creatively to promote innovation and problem solving skills in science classrooms. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 33(2), 181-208. Waynesville, NC USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved April 7, 2018 from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/41402/

Lubart, T. I. (2001). Models of the creative process: Past, present, and future. Creativity Research Journal, 13, 295–308.

Martinez, S. L., & Stager, G. (2013). Invent to Learn: Making, Thinking, and Engineering in the Classroom. Contructing Modern Knowledgs Press.

Meyer, A. A., & Lederman, N. G. (2013). Inventing creativity: An exploration of the pedagogy of ingenuity in science classrooms. School Science and Mathematics, 113(8), 400-409.‏

Pace, G., & Larson, C. (1992). On design technology: Try this exercise in robot making. Science and Children, 29(5), 12–15, 61.

Roll, I. (2009). Structured Invention Activities to Prepare Students for Future Learning: Means, Mechanisms, and Cognitiv Processes. Ph. D. thesis, Pittsburgh, PA.

Rul, A. R., Baldwin, S., & Schell, R. (2009). Trick-or-Treat Candy-Getters and Hornet Scare Devices: Second Grades Make Creative Inventions Related to animal Adaptations. J: Creat, Behav., 4:149-168. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/.2162-6057.2009. Tb01312.

Schauble, L., Klopfer, L. E., & Raghavan, K. (1991). Students’ transition from an engineering model to a science model of experimentation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28, 859–882.

Shelesinger, B. E. (1980). I. Teach Children to be inventors. Edu. :. (April): 572-573.

Shlesinger, B. E., Jr. (1973). The art of successful inventing. Washington, DC: Kelly, Hafner Associates.

Torrance, E. P. (1983). Creativity in the classroom. Washington, DC: National Education Association.

Westberg, K. L. (1996). The effects of teaching students how to invent. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 30, 249–267.

Wongkraso. P., Sitti, S., & Piyakun, A., (2013). A Study of invention Development Process and Invention Instructional Management Process Based on Constructionism in Thailand. In C. Shouniregu, & G. Education (LICE-2013). London Infonomics Society.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

 ISSN: 1305-3515