A Review of Action Research Component in the Pre-Service Teacher Education for Elementary School in Malaysia

Mohd Zaki Mohd Amin, Radzuwan Ab Rashid, Kamarul Shukri Mat Teh

Öz


Abstract: This paper attempts to outline the needs for action research component for the elementary pre-service TESL teachers in the institute of teacher education in Malaysia.  The action research component used to be the compulsory final assessment for the pre-service teachers. However, the curriculum revamp in 2015 provided the pre-service teachers with the options of doing action or conventional research. It is a worrying development as the potential for most students to opt for convenional research over action research is great due to the perceived difficulty of the later.  This will reduce the role of the teacher in research as a mere observer rather than an active agent of change. This paper would present a case for action research by providing the background information on the development of action research in Malaysia and also the issue of teacher quality. The case is further supported by a discusssion on the concept of action research and also the significance of action research in the context of teacher professional development. 


Tam Metin:

PDF (English)

Referanslar


Ado, K. (2013). Action research: Professional development to help support and retain early career teachers. Educational Action Research, 21(2), 131–146. http://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2013.789701

Ahmad, J. (2002). Pemupukan budaya penyelidikan di kalangan guru di sekolah: Satu penilaian [Inculcation of research culture among teachers in schools: An evaluation]. The National University of Malaysia.

Burns, A. (2010). Doing Action Research in English Language Teaching A Guide for Practitioners. United Kingdom: Routledge.

Carr, W., & Kemmis, S. (1983). Becoming critical: knowing through action research. Geelong, Australia: Deakin University.

Darling-Hammond, L. (2006). Powerful Teacher Education: Lessons from Exemplary Programs. The JosseyBass Education Series. Retrieved from http://www.loc.gov/catdir/toc/ecip068/2006004499.html

Darling-Hammond, L. (2010). Teacher Education and the American Future. Journal of Teacher Education, 61(1–2), 35–47. http://doi.org/10.1177/0022487109348024

Darling-Hammond, L., & Friedlaender, D. (2008). Creating Excellent and Equitable Schools. Educational Leadership, 65(8), 14–21. Retrieved from http://ezp.waldenulibrary.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=32135631&site=ehost-live&scope=site

Edwards, R. (2010). Teachers as action researchers. Modern English Teacher, 19(2).

Goh, P. S. C., & Blake, D. (2015). Teacher preparation in Malaysia: needed changes. Teaching in Higher Education, 20(5), 469–480. http://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2015.1020780

Goodson, I. F. (2001). The Principled Professional. Prospects, XXX(2), 181–188. http://doi.org/10.1007/bf02754064

Grundy, S. (1995). Action research as on-going professional development. Perth Western Australia: Arts Accord Affiliation of Arts Educators.

Institut Pendidikan Guru Malaysia. (2015). Buku Panduan Program Ijazah Sarjana Muda Perguruan Dengan Kepujian. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.

Johnson, A. . (2012). A Short Guide to Action Research. Pearson Education. http://doi.org/10.4135/9781412984614

Kemmis, S., McTaggart, R., & Nixon, R. (2014). The action research planner: doing critical participatory action research. London: Springer International Publishing.

Lee, J. C., & Day, C. (2016). Quality and Change in Teacher Education. Springer International Publishing.

McNiff, J., & Whitehead, J. (2011). All you need to know about action research. Action Research. http://doi.org/10.4324/9780203305676

McQuillan, P. J., Welch, M. J., & Barnatt, J. (2012). In search of coherence: “inquiring” at multiple levels of a teacher education system. Educational Action Research, 20(4), 535–551. http://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2012.727640

Meerah, T. S. M., & Osman, K. (2013). What is “action” in action research: A Malaysian exposure. Asian Social Science, 9(16 SPL), 148–153. http://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v9n16p148

Melnick, S. a, & Meister, D. G. (2008). A Comparison of Beginning and Experienced Teachers’ Concerns. Educational Research Quarterly, 31(3), 40–56. http://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004

Nilsen, Trude; Gustafsson, J.-E. (2016). Teacher Quality , Instructional Quality and Student Outcomes. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41252-8

Othman, N., & Yee, S. (2014). Coaching in Action Research. Journal of Empirical Studies, 1(3), 98–104.

Pelton, R. P. (2010). An introduction to action research. In R. P. Pelton (Ed.), Action research for teacher candidates (pp. 3–26). Lanham, Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield Education.

Somekh, B. (2006). Action Research: A Methodology for Change and Development. (P. Sikes, Ed.), Research on Research (Vol. V). London: Open University Press. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8527.2007.00388_3.x

Stronge, J. H., Ward, T. J., Tucker, P. D., & Hindman, J. L. (2007). What is the relationship between teacher quality and student achievement? An exploratory study. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 20(3–4), 165–184. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-008-9053-z

Townsend, A. (2014). Weaving the threads of practice and research. In F. Rauch, A. Schuster, T. Stern, & M. Pribila (Eds.), Promoting change through action research (pp. 7–22). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

Vanderlinde, R., & van Braak, J. (2010). The gap between educational research and practice: views of teachers, school leaders, intermediaries and researchers. British Educational Research Journal, 36(2), 299–316. http://doi.org/10.1080/01411920902919257


Refback'ler

  • Şu halde refbacks yoktur.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

 

 

 

Creative Commons Lisansı

İlköğretim Online Dergisi Creative Commons Alıntı-Gayriticari 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı ile lisanslanmıştır.

ISSN: 1305-3515