Reviewing the Implementation of Life Sciences Curriculum in Turkey Using Elicitation Techniques

Pervin Oya Taneri, Cennet Engin-Demir


The aims of this qualitative case study were (1) to investigate the general characteristics of the Life Sciences Curriculum (LSC); (2) to examine how the LSC is implemented in a public primary school from the perspectives of teachers, students and administrators; and (3) to identify whether implementation of the curriculum was in line with the principles of constructivist pedagogy. The study participants consisted of the school administrator, 2 co-administrators, 4 classroom teachers and 87 students from second- and third-grade classrooms chosen from a primary school in one of the districts of Ankara, Turkey. Data was collected through document analysis, classroom observations, semi-structured interviews with administrators, stimulated-recall interviews with teachers, and creative drama activities with students. Findings indicated that LSC was prepared consistent with constructivist pedagogy. Explicitly, multiple intelligences theory and contemporary teaching-learning approaches were kept in view in the design of the LSC, and the curriculum composed of thematic units that focuses on developing skills like critical thinking, creative thinking and problem-solving.

Keywords: Curriculum Evaluation, Life Sciences Curriculum, Constructivist Pedagogy, Implementation Evaluation, Elicitation Techniques.

Tam Metin:

DOCX (English)


Akınoğlu, O. (2008). The curricular reform initiatives of Turkey in the fields of life science and social studies in the process of accession to the European Union. World Applied Sciences Journal, 3(2), 168-183.

Akpınar, B. (2010). Yapılandırmacı yaklaşımda öğretmenin, öğrencinin ve velinin rolü. [Role of the teachers, student and parents in constructivist approach]. Eğitime Bakış, Eğitim-Öğretim ve Bilim Araştırması Dergisi, 6(16), 16-20.

Altınyelken, H. K. (2010) Curriculum change in Uganda: Teacher perspectives on the new thematic curriculum. International Journal of Educational Development, 30(2), 151-161.

Azzarito, L. & Ennis, C. D. (2003). A sense of connection: Toward social constructivist physical education. Sport, Education, and Society, 8, 179-198.

Babadoğan, C. & Olkun, S. (2006). Program development models and reform in Turkish primary school mathematics curriculum. International Journal for Mathematics Teaching and Learning. Retrieved October, 10, 2010 from

Badders, W. (2000.) Methods of Assessment. Retrieved on May 21, 2010, from

Barone, T. & Eisner, E. (2006). Arts-based educational research. In J. Green, G. Camilli, and P. N. Elmore (Eds.), Handbook of complementary methods in education research (pp. 93-107). New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Barton, K. C. (2015). Elicitation techniques: getting people to talk about ideas they don’t usually talk about, Theory and Research in Social Education, 43(2), 179-205.

Baxter, P. & Jack, S. (2008). Qualitative case study methodology: Study design and implementation for novice researchers, in The Qualitative Report, 13(4), 544-559. Retrieved August, 10, 2010 from

Birgin, O. Tutak, T. & Türkdoğan, A. (2009). Primary school teachers’ views about the new Turkish primary school mathematics curriculum. E-Journal of New World Sciences Academy, 4(2), 270-280.

Bloom, B. (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. New York, Longmans, Green.

Bogdan, R. & Biklen, S. K. (2007). Qualitative Research for Education: An Introduction to Theories and Methods. Boston, Mass. Pearson A & B.

Brooks, J. G. & Brooks, M. G. (1999). In Search of Understanding: The Case for Constructivist Classrooms. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Burris, S. & Garton, B.L. (2006). An investigation of the critical thinking ability of secondary agriculture students. Journal of Southern Agricultural Education Research, 56 (1), 18-29.

Carless, D.R. (1998). A case study of curriculum innovation in Hong Kong. System, 26, 353–368.

Christensen, P. M. & James, A. (2008). Research with Children: Perspectives and Practices. (2nd ed.). Falmer Press, London; New York: Routledge.

Copley, J. (1992). The integration of teacher education and technology: a constructivist model. In D. Carey, R. Carey, D. Willis, and J. Willis (Eds.), Technology and Teacher Education, Charlottesville, VA: AACE, 681.

Curriculum Review Commission (2005). Yeni öğretim programlarını inceleme ve değerlendirme raporu. [Report on the new curricula: grades 1-5]. Istanbul: Education Reform Initiative. (Unpublished Report). Retrieved June, 14, 2010 from

Dağlı, M. (2008). Integrating critical thinking skills into planning and implementation of teaching Turkish: A comparative case study of three teachers. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey.

Davis, E.A. (2003). Knowledge integration in science teaching: Analyzing teachers' knowledge development. Research in Science Education, 34, 21–53.

Demir, S. (1998). Cumhuriyet döneminde program geliştirme açısından hayat bilgisi programlarının incelenmesi [Investigation of life sciences curricula in relation to the program development at republic era]. Unpublished master’s thesis. Marmara University Educational Sciences Institute, İstanbul, Turkey.

Demiralay, R. & Karadeniz, Ş. (2008). Developing information literacy skills for lifelong learning in elementary education. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 3(2), 89-119.

El-Hindi, A. E., (1998). Beyond classroom boundaries: Constructivist teaching with the Internet. Reading Teacher, 51(8), 694-700.

El-Sheikh Hasan, O. H. (2000). Improving the quality of learning: global education as a vehicle for school reform. Theory into Practice, 39 (2), 97-104.

Ersoy, A. F. & Kaya, E. (2008). The perceptions of students towards the social studies curriculum (2004) according to the opinions of classroom teachers. Anatolia University Journal of Social Sciences, 8(1), 285–300.

Feigelman, S. (2007). Middle childhood. In R.M. Kliegman et al., eds., Nelson Textbook of Pediatrics, 18th ed., (pp. 57–60). Philadelphia: Saunders Elsevier.

Fields, M. V. & Fields, D. (2006). Constructive Guidance and Discipline. Preschool and Primary Education. (4th Ed.). Prentice Hall.

Flewitt, R. (2005) Conducting research with young children: Some ethical considerations. Early Child Development and Care, 175(6), 553-56.

Flouris, G. & Pasias, G. (2003). A critical appraisal of curriculum reform in Greece (1980–2002) trends, challenges, and perspectives. European Education, 35 (3), 73–90.

Fosnot, C.T. (2006). Constructivism: Theory, Perspectives, and Practice. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

Fraser, S. (2004). Situating empirical research. In S. Fraser, V. Lewis, S. Ding, M. Kellett, C. Robinson (Eds.). Doing research with children and young people. (pp. 15–26). London: Sage.

Gagnon, G. & Collay, M. (2006). Constructivist Learning Design: Key Questions for Teaching to Standards. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

Gulbahar, Y., & Guven, I. (2008). A Survey on ICT Usage and the Perceptions of Social Studies Teachers in Turkey. Educational Technology & Society, 11 (3), 37-51.

Glasersfeld, E. von. (1992). A constructivist approach to teaching. Paper presented at the Alternative Epistemologies Conference at the University of Georgia, Athens, GA.

Gökçek, T. (2009). How mathematics teachers’ concerns changed within the context of curriculum reform? Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences. 1(1), 1052–1056.

Gömleksiz, M. N. & Bulut, İ. (2007). Yeni hayat bilgisi dersi öğretim programının uygulamadaki etkililiğinin değerlendirilmesi. [An evaluation of the effectiveness of the new primary school life sciences curriculum in practice]. Millî Eğitim, 173, 67-88.

Grossman, G. M., Onkol, P. E. & Sands, M. (2007). Curriculum reform in Turkish teacher education: Attitudes of teacher educators towards change in an EU candidate nation. International Journal of Educational Development, 27 (2), 138–150.

Gruba, P. & Sondergaard, H. (2001). A constructivist approach to communication skills instruction in Henson, K. T. (1995). Curriculum development for education reform. New York: Longman.

Gruba, P. and H. Sondergaard, 2001. A constructivist approach to communication skills instruction incomputer science. Computer Science Education, 11 (3), 203-219,

Haser, Ç. & Star, J.R. (2009). Change in beliefs after first-year of teaching: the case of Turkish national curriculum context. International Journal of Educational Development, 29 (3), 293–302.

Jagodzinski, J. & Wallin, J. (2013). Arts-based research: A critique and a proposal. Sense Publishers. Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Jonassen, D. H. (1992). Evaluating constructivist learning. In Duffy, TM and Jonassen, DH (Eds.) Constructivism and the technology of instruction, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc., Hillsdale, NJ, (pp. 137–148).

Kanuka, H. & Anderson, T, (1999). Using constructivism in technology-mediated learning: Constructing order out of the chaos in the literature. Radical Pedagogy, 1(2). Retrieved May, 8, 2009 from

Kırkgöz, Y. (2008). A case study of teachers' implementation of curriculum innovation in English language teaching in Turkish Primary Education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 1859-1875

Knobloch, N. A. (2002). Transforming the curriculum for the 21st century. The Agricultural Education Magazine, 75 (3), 14-15.

Koc, Y., Isiksal, M., & Bulut, S. (2007). Elementary school curriculum reform in Turkey. International Education Journal, 8(1), 30-3924.

Kumari, P. (2009). Strands of constructivism in the Bhagavad-Gita. Educational Research and Review, 4 (11), 530-534.

Larochelle, M. (2010). Constructivism and Education. West Nyack, NY: CambridgeUniversity Press.

Lewis, V., Kellet, M., Robinson, C., Fraser, S., & Ding, S. (2004). The Reality of Research with Children and Young People. London, Sage.

Lyle, J. (2003). Stimulated recall: A report on its use in naturalistic research. British Educational Research Journal, 29, 861-878.

MacAulay, D. J. (1990). Classroom environment: A literature review. Educational Psychology, 10(3), 239-253.

Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (2006). Designing Qualitative Research. (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

McCaslin, N. (2006). Creative drama in the classroom and beyond. Pearson Education, Inc.

McNamara, D (2002) Classroom organization for flexible teaching. In A. Pollard (Eds.), Reading for Reflective Teaching. (pp. 202-204). London: Continuum.

Ministry of National Education. (2005). İlköğretim 1, 2 ve 3. sınıflar hayat bilgisi dersi öğretim programı ve kılavuzu. [The teaching curriculum of the life sciences course for the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd grades of primary education]. State Books Directorate Press. Ankara.

Morey, O. (2010). Loving care for a person with dementia: from phenomenological findings to lifeworld theatre. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Bournemouth University, UK.

Moyer, P. S., Bolyard, J. J. & Spikell, M. A. (2002). What are virtual manipulatives? Teaching Children Mathematics, 8(6), 372-377.

O'Brien, J. (1993). Action research through stimulated recall. Research in Science Education. 23(1), 214-221.

Özdemir, A. & Yıldız, M., (2009). İlköğretim hayat bilgisi 3- öğretmen kılavuz kitabı. [Elementary life sciences 3- the teacher guidebook]. (2nd ed.). Doğan Ofset. İstanbul.

Papert, S. (1981). Mind-storms: Children, computers, and powerful ideas. The Two Year College Mathematics Journal, 12 (4), 285-286. Retrieved April 5, 2010 from

Parkerson, D. H. & Parkerson, J. A. (2008). The American Teacher: Foundations of Education. New York: Routhledge.

Patton, M.Q. (1990). Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods, (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

Pépin, Y. (1998). Practical Knowledge and school knowledge: A constructivist representation of education in Larochelle M. Bednarz N. & Garrison G. (Eds) Constructivism and Education 1998 Cambridge University Press, New York.

Phillips, D.C. (2000). Constructivism in Education. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Pressley, M., Harris, K.R., & Marks, M.B. (1992). But good strategy instructors are constructivists. Educational Psychology Review 4, 3-31.

Ryan, J., & Gass, S. (2012). Stimulated recall. In R. Barnard & A. Burns, (EDs). Multilingual Matters, pp.144-161.

Richardson, J. S., Morgan, R. F. & Fleener. C. E. (2012). Reading to Learn in the Content Areas. (8th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

Şentürk, C. (2009). Eğitimde Yeniden Yapılanma ve Yapılandırmacılık. [Restructuring and constructivism in education]. Retrieved April, 5, 2010 from

Sewell, A. (2002). Constructivism and student and misconceptions: Why every teachers needs to know about them. Australian Sciences Teacher Journals, 48(4), 24-28.

Shoemaker, B. (1989). Integrative education: A curriculum for the twenty-first century. Oregon School Study Council, 33, 2.

Sönmez, V. (1996). Hayat Bilgisi Öğretimi ve Öğretmen Kılavuzu. [The teacher guidebook of life sciences teaching]. Anı Publishing. Ankara.

Temizkan, M. & Bağcı, H. (2008). 2005 İlköğretim Türkçe dersi öğretim (5. sınıflar) programı öğrenme alanlarının öğretmen görüşlerine göre değerlendirilmesi. [Evaluation of teaching areas of elementary school Turkish course (5th grade) according to teachers’ opinions]. Millî Eğitim, 179, 178-194.

Tisdall, E.K. M., Davis, J. M. & Gallagher, M. (2009). Researching with Children and Young People: Research Design, Methods and Analysis. Los Angeles; London: SAGE.

Tomei, L. A. (2008). Encyclopedia of Information Technology Curriculum Integration. Hershey, PA: IGI Global.

Walker, H. M. & Walker, J. E. (1991). Coping with Non-Compliance in the Classroom: A Positive Approach for Teachers. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.

Watts, J. (1994). Quality in Teaching and Learning Workshop 2: Quality Teaching in Higher Education - Issues and Themes, Rockhampton, Qld, Central Queensland University.

Williams, S. & Charlesb, L. (2008). The experience of developing early childhood learning goals and outcomes in the Caribbean and the implications for curriculum development and implementation. International Journal of Early Years Education, 16(1), 17–29.

Woolfolk, A. E. (1993). Educational Psychology. (5th ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

Wort, M. (2007). Discussion paper: Strategy white paper. Support to Basic Education Program. Unpublished manuscript.

Yin, R.K. (2009). Case Study Research. Design and Methods. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.

Yıldırım, A. (2006). Yeni ilköğretim programına göre hazırlanmış hayat bilgisi ders kitaplarına ilişkin öğretmen görüşlerinin incelenmesi (Elazığ örneği) [Investigation of life sciences textbooks in relation to teachers’ opinions]. Unpublished master’s thesis, Fırat University Social Sciences Institute. Elazığ, Turkey.

Yıldırım, A., Güneri, O.Y., & Sümer, Z.H., (2002). Development and Learning. Seçkin Publications. Ankara.


  • Şu halde refbacks yoktur.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.




Creative Commons Lisansı

İlköğretim Online Dergisi Creative Commons Alıntı-Gayriticari 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı ile lisanslanmıştır.

ISSN: 1305-3515