Supporting the Professional Development of Early Childhood Teachers in Head Start: A Case of Acquiring Technology Proficiency

Arzu Arıkan, David E. Fernie, Rebecca Kantor


The main purpose of this paper is to describe an exemplary professional development approach in technology learning and its outcomes for early childhood teachers in Head Start in the context of a technology project. The study utilized a collage of qualitative methods including case study, ethnography, and grounded theory. Research participants were selected using purposive sampling methods, and they include 23 people who participated in the technology project. Data collection techniques included multiple, face-to-face, telephone and focus group interviews, observations, and collection of documents and artifacts related to the technology project from the participants. NVIVO qualitative data management software was used for the analysis, and the coding procedures were applied that grounded theory offered. Findings suggest that the communities of learner model of professional development supported early childhood teachers’ technology learning in Head Start. The learning curve experienced by the teachers in emotional, cognitive and behavioral dimensions indicates the importance of nature of learners and supportive learning contexts in technology learning.

Tam Metin:

PDF (English)


Akçaoglu, M., Gümüs, S., Bellibaş, M. S., & Boyerd, D. M. (2015). Policy, practice, and reality: Exploring a nation-wide technology implementation in Turkish schools, Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 24 (4), 477–491,

Anderson, R. E., & Dexter, S. (2005). School technology leadership: An empirical investigation of prevalence and effect, Educational Administration Quarterly, 41( 1), 49-82.

Archer, K., Savage, R., Sanghera-Sidhu, S., Wood, E., Gottardo, A., & Chen, V. (2014). Examining the effectiveness of technology use in classrooms: A tertiary meta-analysis, Computers & Education, 78, 140-149.

Ball, R. A. (2002). Strategies for building partnerships with academic institutions, Head Start Bulletin, 72, 3-4.

Barron, L. C., & Goldman, E. S. (1994). Integrating technology with teacher preparation. In B. Means (Ed.), Technology and education reform: The reality behind the promise (pp. 81-110). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

Becker, H. J. (1991). How computers are used in United States schools: Basic data from the 1989 I.E.A. computers in education survey, Journal of Educational Computing Research, 7(4), 385-406.

Bell, R. L., Maeng, J. L., & Binns, I. C. (2013). Learning in context: Technology integration in a teacher preparation program informed by situated learning theory, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(3), 348-379.

Berger, P., & Luckmann, T. (1967). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Garden City, NY: Anchor.

Bruckman, A. (1998). Community support for constructionist learning, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 7(1/2), 47-86.

Buysse, V., Winton, P. J., Rous, B., (2009). Reaching consensus on a definition of professional development for the early childhood field, Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 28 (4), 235-243. doi: 10.1177/0271121408328173

Calderwood, P. (2000). Learning communities: Finding common ground in difference. New York: Teachers College, Columbia University.

Cobb, P., & Bowers, J. (1999). Cognitive and situated learning perspectives in theory and practice. Educational Researcher, 28(2), 4–15.

Cole, M. (Ed.). (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes / L. S. Vygotsky. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Cookson, P. W. J. (1995). The federal commitment to educational reform 1973-1993: From self-help to systemic reform. In W. T. Pink & G. W. Noblit (Eds.), Continuity and contradiction: The futures of the sociology of education (pp. 239-254). Cresskill, New Jersey: Hampton Press, Inc.

Corbin, J. (1986). Coding, writing memos, and diagramming. In C. W. Chenitz & J. Swanson, M. (Eds.), From practice to grounded theory (pp. 102-120). Menlo Park, CA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.

Damarin, S. K. (2000). The 'Digital Divide' versus digital differences: Principles for equitable use of technology in education, Educational Technology, 40(4), 17-22.

D'Amico, J. J. (2001). Technology in America's schools: An overview of status and issues, ERS Spectrum, 19(1), 4-8.

Darling-Hammond, L., & McLaughlin, M. W. (1995). Policies that support professional development in an era of school reform, Phi Delta Kappan, 76(8), 597-604.

Erickson, F. (1986). Qualitative methods in research on teaching. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 119-161). New York: McMillian.

Fine, M., Weis, L., Weseen, S., & Wong, L. (2000). For whom? Qualitative research, representations, and social responsibilities. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 107-133). Thousand Oaks:CA: Sage Publications, Inc.

Foster, S. P. (2000). The digital divide: Some reflections, International Informatics & Library Review, 32, 437-451.

Fullerton, K. (1998). Common "Mythstakes" in technology planning. In K. C. Westbrook (Ed.), Technology and the educational workplace: Understanding fiscal impacts (pp. 63-76). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

Fyson, S. J. (1999). Developing and applying concepts about community: reflections from the field, Journal of Community Psychology, 27(3), 347-365.

Garland, V. E., & Wotton, S. E. (2001). Bridging the digital divide in public schools, Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 30(2), 115-123.

Gergen, K. J. (2001). Social construction in context. London and New Delhi: Sage Publications.

Gladieux, L. E., & Swail, W. S. (1999). The Virtual University & educational opportunity. Issues of Equity and Access for the Next Generation. Policy Perspectives. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service. No. ED. 428637).

Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Co.

Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (2001). The discovery of grounded theory and applying grounded theory. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The American tradition in qualitative research (Vol. II, pp. 229-243). London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi: Sage Publications.

Grundy, S. (1999). Patterns in learning: School-based and university-based communities of learning. In J. Retallick, K. Coombe & B. Cocklin (Eds.), Learning communities in education (pp. 44-59). New York: Routledge.

Hamby, T. M. (1975). My teacher is a CDA. Washington, D.C.: University Research Corporation.

Helleve, I. (2009). Theoretical foundations of teachers’ professional development. In J. O. Lindberg & A. D. Olofsson (Ed.). Online learning communities and teacher professional development: Methods for improved education delivery. (pp. 1-19) Hershey, PA, New York: IGI Global.

Henning, E., & Van der Westhuizen, D. (2004). Crossing the digital divide safely and trustingly: how ecologies of learning scaffold the journey, Computers and Education, 42(4), 333-352.

Herrenkohl, L. R., & Wertch, J. V. (1999). The use of cultural tools: Mastery and appropriation. In I. E. Siegel (Ed.), Development of mental representation. Theories and applications (pp. 415-435). Mahwah, New Jersey, London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.

Hillesheim, G. (1998). Distance learning: Barriers and strategies for students and faculty, The Internet and Higher Education, 1(1), 31-44.

Holt, D. T., & Crocker, M. (2000). Prior negative experiences: their impact on computer training outcomes, Computers and Education, 35(4), 295-308.

Hong, S. B., & Trepanier-Street, M. (2004). Technology: A Tool for knowledge construction in a Reggio Emilia inspired teacher education program, Early Childhood Education Journal, 32(2), 87-94.

Isci, T. G., & Demir, S. B. (2015). The use of tablets distributed within the scope of FATIH Project for education in Turkey (is FATIH Project a fiasco or a technological revolution?). Universal Journal of Educational Research 3(7): 442-450. DOI: 10.13189/ujer.2015.030703

Jenlink, P. M., & Kinnucan-Welsch, K. (2001). Case stories of facilitating professional development, Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 705-724.

Kennedy, A. (2005) Models of continuing professional development: a framework for analysis, Journal of In-service Education, 31(2), 235–50.

Kent, T. W., & McNergney, R. F. (1999). Will technology really change education? From blackboard to web. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corvin Press, Inc.

King, K. P. (2002). Educational technology professional development as transformative learning opportunities, Computers and Education, 39(3), 283-297.

Kotrlik, J. W., & Redmann, D. H. (2005). Extent of technology integration in instruction by adult basic education teachers, Adult Education Quarterly, 55(3), 200-219.

Kozulin, A. (2002). Sociocultural theory and the mediated learning experience, School Psychology International, 23(1), 7-35.

Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

Lawson, K. G. (2005). Using eclectic digital resources to enhance instructional methods for adult learners, OCLC Systems & Services: International Digital Library Perspectives, 21(1), 49-60.

Levinson, B. A. U., & Sutton, M. (2001). Policy as practice- A Sociocultural approach to the study of educational policy. In B. A. U. Levinson & M. Sutton (Eds.), Policy as practice: Toward a comparative sociocultural analysis of educational policy (pp. 1-22). Westport, Connecticut and London: Ablex Publishing.

Lieberman, A. (1995). Practices that support teacher development, Phi Delta Kappan, 76(8), 591-596.

Light, J. S. (2001). Rethinking the digital divide, Harvard Educational Review, 71(4), 709-733.

Little, J. W. (1993). Teacher professional development in a climate of educational reform, Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 15(2), 129-151.

Long, D., & Riegle, R. (2002). Teacher education: The key to effective school reform. Westport, Connecticut: Bergin & Garvey.

Lubeck, S., deVries, M., Nicholson, J., & Post, J. (1997). Head Start in transition, Early Education & Development, 8(3), 219-244.

Mantilla, E. M. (2001). Teachers' perceptions of their participation in policy choices: The bottom-up approach of the Nueva Escuela Unitaria in Guetemala. In M. Sutton & B. A. U. Levinson (Eds.), Policy as practice: Toward a comparative sociocultural analysis of educational policy (pp. 103-123). Connecticut: Ablex Publishing.

Marcus, G. E. (1998). Ethnography through tick and thin. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

Martinez-Beck, I.; Zaslow, M. (2006). Introduction: The context for critical issues in early childhood professional development. In M. Zaslow & I. Martinez-Beck, (Eds). Critical issues in early childhood professional development (p. 1-16). Baltimore: Brooks.

McCotter, S. S. (2001). Collaborative groups as professional development, Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 685-704.

McDonald, S. D. (2001). Capital info: E-rate for everyone, Momentum, 32(2), 77-78.

McMillian, D. W., & Chavis, D. M. (1986). Sense of community: A definition and theory. Journal of Community Psychology, 14, 6-22.

Mergendoller, J. R. (2000). Technology and learning: A critical assessment, Principal, 79(3), 5-9.

Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

National Association for the Education of Young Children & the Fred Rogers Center (2012). Technology and interactive media as tools in early childhood programs serving children from birth through age 8. A position statement. Retrieved on 10-March-2017 at

National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC) (1993). A conceptual framework for early childhood professional development. Retrieved on 10-March-2017 at

Ortega, M., & Bravo, J. (2001). Computers and education: Towards an interconnected society. Dordrecht; Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Parker, E. B. (2000). Closing the digital divide in rural America, Telecommunications Policy, 24, 281-290.

Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Payne, J. S. (1973). Head Start: A tragicomedy with epilogue. New York: Behavioral Publications.

Post, J., & Lubeck, S. (2000). Head Start-university collaborations: Widening the circle, Annual Theme, 277-282.

PT3 Website. (2002). Transforming teacher education through technology infusion. Retrieved on 17-November-2002 at

Retallick, J. (1999). Transforming schools into learning communities: Beginning the journey. In J. Retallick, B. Cocklin & K. Coombe (Eds.), Learning communities in education (pp. 107-131). New York: Routledge.

Rogoff, B. (1995). Observing sociocultural activity on three planes: Participatory appropriation, guided participation, and apprenticeship. In J. V. Wertsch, P. Del Rio & A. Alvarez (Eds.), Sociocultural studies of mind (pp. 139-164). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Russell, A. L. (1995). Stages in learning new technology: naive adult email users, Computers & Education, 25(4), 173-178.

Schwab, R. G. (2001). "That school gotta recognize our policy!": The appropriation of educational policy in an Australian Aboriginal Community. In M. Sutton & B. A. U. Levinson (Eds.), Policy as practice (pp. 219-243). Connecticut: Ablex Publishing.

Selwyn, N. (1997). The continuing weakness of educational computing research, British Journal of Educational Technology, 28(4), 305-307.

Selwyn, N. (2002). 'E-stablishing' an inclusive society? Technology, social exclusion and UK government policy making, Policy Studies Journal, 29(4), 551-570.

Sergiovanni, T. (1994a). Building community in schools (1st ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Sergiovanni, T. (1994b). Organizations or communities? Changing the metaphor changes the theory, Educational Administration Quarterly, 30, 214-226.

Sergiovanni, T. (1999). The story of community. In J. Retallick, B. Cocklin & K. Coombe (Eds.), Learning communities in education (pp. 9-25). New York: Routledge.

Shapiro, N. S., & Levine, J. H. (1999). Creating learning communities: a practical guide to winning support, organizing for change, and implementing programs (1st ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

Sheridan, S. M., Edwards, C. P., Marvin, C. A. & Knoche, L. L. (2009). Professional development in early childhood programs: Process issues and research needs, Early Educ Dev., 20(3), 377–401. doi:10.1080/10409280802582795

Shin, W. (2015). Teachers’ use of technology and its influencing factors in Korean elementary schools. Technology, Pedagogy and Education. 24 (4), 461–476.

Spradley, P. J. (1979). The ethnographic interview. New York, London, Sydney: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

Svensson, A. K. (2000). Computers in school: Socially isolating or a tool to promote collaboration? Journal of Educational Computing Research, 22(4), 437-453.

Thomas, G., Wineburg, S., Grossman, P., Myhre, O., & Woolworth, S. (1998). In the company of colleagues: An interim report on the development of a community of teacher learners, Teaching and Teacher Education, 14(1), 21-32.

Thurston, C. O., Secaras, E., D., & Levin, J. A. (1996). Teaching tele-apprenticeships: An innovative model for technology integration in teacher education, JRCE, 28(5), 1-7.

Turbill, J. (2001). A Researcher goes to school: Using technology in the kindergarten literacy curriculum, Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 1(3), 255-279.

VanderVen, K. (1994). Professional development: A contextual model. In J. Julienne & J. B. McCracken (Eds.), The early childhood career lattice: Perspectives on professional development (pp. 79-89). Washington, D.C.: NAEYC.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Ward, M. & Costello, E. (2016). Education reform with technology - difficult but worth the effort? In Proceedings of Global Learn 2016 Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE) (pp. 71-78). Retrieved on 12-July-2016 at

Warschauer, M. (2002). Reconceptualizing the digital divide, FirstMonday, 7(7), 1-16.

Washington, V., & Bailey, O. U. J. (1995). Project Head Start: models and strategies for the twenty-first century. New York: Garland Pub.

Wedman, J., & Diggs, L. (2001). Identifying barriers to technology-enhanced learning environments in teacher education, Computers in Human Behavior, 17, 421-430.

Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge, U.K.; New York, N.Y.: Cambridge University Press.

Wenger, E., McDermott, R. A., & Snyder, W. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice: A guide to managing knowledge. Boston: Harvard Business Press.

Wertsch, J. K., Tulviste, P., & Hagstrom, F. (1993). A Sociocultural approach to agency. In E. A. Forman, N. Minick & C. A. Stone (Eds.), Contexts for learning: Sociocultural dynamics in children's development (pp. 336-356). Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.

Weston, T. J. (2005). Why faculty did-and did not-integrate instructional software in their undergraduate classrooms, Journal of Innovative Higher Education. 30(2), 99 - 115.

Wood, E., Willoughby, T., Specht, J., Stern-Cavalcante, W., & Child, C. (2002). Developing a computer workshop to facilitate computer skills and minimize anxiety for early childhood educators, Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(1), 164-170.

Yelland, N. (1999). Technology as play, Early Childhood Education Journal, 26(4), 217-220.

Zaharlick, A. (1992). Ethnography in anthropology and its value for education, Theory into Practice, 31(2), 58-67.

Zigler, E., & Muenchow, S. (1992). Head Start: The Inside story of America's most successful educational experiment. New York: BasicBooks.

Zyad, H. (2016). Integrating computers in the classroom: Barriers and teachers' attitudes, International Journal of Instruction, 9(1), 65-78.


  • Şu halde refbacks yoktur.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.




Creative Commons Lisansı

İlköğretim Online Dergisi Creative Commons Alıntı-Gayriticari 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı ile lisanslanmıştır.

ISSN: 1305-3515